Lungs and airways
What research found here. What was shown to help comes first, then the risks reported, most common first.
Lungs and airways
Strong several reviews agree · Moderate one review or consistent trials · Limited one or a few small studies · Untested no study in people, listed with what it rests on
Shown to help69
Acute sinus infection in adults
Shown to cure slightly more adults with acute sinusitis than placebo, 5 to 11 more per 100, while 13 more per 100 had side effects.
Compared with placebo or no treatment [1]; placebo [2]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Without antibiotics, 46% were cured at 1 week and 64% at 14 days. With a clinical diagnosis, antibiotics raised cure (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.54), a number needed to treat of 19, and 10 when the diagnosis was confirmed on imaging. Side effects were more frequent (OR 2.21), one extra person harmed for every 8 treated [1]. In individual patient data from 9 trials, 15 adults needed antibiotics for one more to be cured, and common signs and symptoms could not pick out who would benefit [2].
- Population
- 3,057 adults in 15 trials in ambulatory care [1]; 2,547 adults in 9 trials [2].
- Sources
- [1], [2]
- Caveats
- Children, people with weakened immune systems and severe sinusitis were not studied [1]. The trials used a range of antibiotics.
Quitting smoking
Shown to raise smoking quit rates about 1.6 times over placebo, roughly 3 extra quitters per 100, and less than varenicline did.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Bupropion raised quit rates against placebo or no drug (RR 1.60, 95% CI 1.49 to 1.72, 50 studies) [4]. In a network meta-analysis the odds ratio against control was 1.43 (95% CrI 1.26 to 1.62), which the authors put at 3 additional quitters per 100 (95% CrI 2 to 4) [5]. In a trial of 8,144 smokers, abstinence was more likely on bupropion than placebo (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.75 to 2.45) and more likely on varenicline than bupropion (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.52 to 2.01) [6]. Quit rates on bupropion were lower than on varenicline (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.80) and similar to single-form nicotine replacement (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.13) [4].
- Population
- 18,577 participants in 50 studies, mostly adults from the community or cessation clinics [4]; 14,759 participants in 71 RCTs of bupropion within a 319-trial network [5]; 8,144 smokers with and without psychiatric disorders [6].
- Sources
- [4], [5], [6]
- Caveats
- Both reviews rated the bupropion evidence high certainty. 118 of the trials in the network reported drug or tobacco industry funding [5].
Treating deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism
Shown to prevent repeat clots about as well as warfarin-based treatment in adults with acute venous clots, with about 40% less major bleeding.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across six phase 3 trials, recurrent venous thromboembolism occurred in 2.0% on a DOAC and 2.2% on a vitamin K antagonist (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.06), and major bleeding was lower on a DOAC (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.83) [7]. A Cochrane review of 21 trials found no clear difference in recurrent clots for factor Xa inhibitors (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.01) or for direct thrombin inhibitors (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.65) against conventional anticoagulation, with less major bleeding on both (OR 0.63 and 0.58) [8]. With apixaban, recurrent clots or related death occurred in 2.3% against 2.7% on conventional therapy, and major bleeding in 0.6% against 1.8% (RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.55) [9].
- Population
- 27,023 patients in six trials [7]; 30,895 participants in 21 trials [8]; 5,244 patients with acute venous thromboembolism [9].
- Sources
- [7], [8], [9]
- Caveats
- The trials were designed to show DOACs were not worse than warfarin-based treatment. No placebo group was used.
Lung function and symptoms in asthma
Shown to improve lung function, morning peak flow and symptoms against placebo in mild to moderate asthma, and to cut withdrawals for asthma attacks on budesonide by about 83%.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Fluticasone at 100 to 1,000 mcg a day raised FEV1 by 0.1 to 0.43 L and morning peak flow by 23 to 46 L/min, improved symptom scores and cut rescue inhaler use by 1 to 1.4 puffs a day. At 1,000 to 1,500 mcg a day, more people could stop oral prednisolone (Peto OR 14.07) [1]. Budesonide raised FEV1 by 3.7% of predicted and morning peak flow by 29 L/min, and withdrawal for asthma exacerbation was less likely (RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.33) [2].
- Population
- 86 studies with 16,160 participants [1]; 43 studies with 2,801 participants [2].
- Sources
- [1], [2]
- Caveats
- Low doses of fluticasone gave only slightly smaller gains than high doses [1]. Budesonide doses of 500 to 800 mcg a day showed slightly larger effects than lower doses, with no added gain at high doses [2].
Triple inhalers in COPD
Shown to cut moderate or severe COPD exacerbations against dual inhalers, and to lower deaths against two bronchodilators without a steroid, but not against a steroid-bronchodilator pair.
Compared with a long-acting antimuscarinic alone, a long-acting antimuscarinic with a long-acting beta-agonist, or an inhaled steroid with a long-acting beta-agonist [11][12][13]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Triple therapy lowered moderate or severe exacerbations against an antimuscarinic alone (rate ratio 0.71), two bronchodilators (0.78) and a steroid-beta-agonist pair (0.77). Pneumonia was higher than with two bronchodilators (RR 1.53) [11]. Over 52 weeks, deaths were lower than with two bronchodilators (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.90) but not than with a steroid-beta-agonist pair (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.24) [12]. A 2025 analysis also found fewer deaths than with two bronchodilators (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.97) [13].
- Population
- 21 trials [11]; 6 trials with 22,669 patients [12]; randomized trials in moderate to severe COPD [13].
- Sources
- [11], [12], [13]
- Caveats
- Most trials enrolled people with advanced COPD and recent exacerbations [11]. The three analyses share many trials.
Sleepiness in sleep apnea despite CPAP
Shown to reduce residual sleepiness in sleep apnea, about 2 to 3 points on the Epworth scale, with about three times the adverse events of placebo.
Compared with placebo, on top of CPAP [3][4][5]
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Modafinil or armodafinil improved Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores by 2.2 points (95% CI 1.5 to 2.9) and Maintenance of Wakefulness Test times by 3 minutes (95% CI 2.1 to 3.8) over placebo. Adverse events tripled and withdrawals for adverse events doubled, with no rise in hospitalizations or deaths [4]. A second meta-analysis found Epworth scores lower by 2.96 points with modafinil (95% CI 2.19 to 3.73) and 2.63 with armodafinil (95% CI 1.85 to 3.40) [5]. In the 12-week label trial, 61% on modafinil 200 mg and 68% on 400 mg were rated improved against 37% on placebo [3].
- Population
- 1,466 patients in 10 trials of at least 2 weeks [4]; 723 patients in 11 modafinil trials and 1,009 in 5 armodafinil trials [5]; 327 adults with sleep apnea, 80% fully using CPAP [3].
- Sources
- [3], [4], [5]
- Caveats
- The European Medicines Agency removed this indication in 2011 over an unfavorable balance of benefit and risk, which the first review sought to re-examine [4]. The drug treats sleepiness, not the airway obstruction [3].
Chronic bronchitis and COPD exacerbations
Shown to lower exacerbations in chronic bronchitis and COPD, about 13 to 25% fewer. The reviews disagree on which dose range showed it.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 13 studies (4,155 patients), NAC lowered exacerbations (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.84). In spirometry-confirmed COPD, doses above 600 mg a day gave RR 0.75 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.82) [3]. A 2026 meta-analysis of 14 RCTs (2,856 COPD patients) found fewer exacerbations (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.96). There, 600 mg a day or less gave RR 0.84 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.97) and higher doses RR 0.88 (95% CI 0.73 to 1.06). FEV1, FVC, St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire scores and glutathione did not improve [4]. A 2026 dose meta-analysis found FEV1, FVC and FEV1/FVC improved at 1,200 mg a day or more and not at lower doses [5].
- Population
- 1,933 on NAC and 2,222 on placebo or control [3]; 1,295 on NAC and 1,314 controls in the exacerbation analysis of [4]; COPD trials from 2000 to 2024 [5].
- Sources
- [3], [4], [5]
- Caveats
- The effect was more apparent in patients without airway obstruction [3]. The two exacerbation reviews disagree on which dose range showed the effect [3][4]. The lung function reviews disagree, and [5] reported substantial heterogeneity for some outcomes.
Asthma attacks
Shown to lower hospital admission and relapse after an asthma attack, with about 8 to 10 people treated to prevent one.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Given within an hour of arriving at an emergency department, systemic corticosteroids lowered hospital admission (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.78), a number needed to treat of 8. Oral corticosteroids in children showed a larger effect (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.53), and no adult trial used the oral route [1]. After discharge, a short course lowered relapse needing more care in the first week (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.2 to 0.74) and over 21 days (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.89), and lowered later hospitalization (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.95), with about 10 treated to prevent one relapse [2].
- Population
- 863 people with acute asthma in 12 studies [1]; 374 people in 6 trials, 5 of them of oral corticosteroids [2].
- Sources
- [1], [2]
- Caveats
- The reviews date from 2001 and 2007 and cover small trials. Side effects were rarely reported and did not differ from placebo over 7 to 10 days [2].
Lung cancer after quitting
Linked to steadily lower lung cancer risk with each year after quitting in pooled cohorts, with about a fifth of the excess remaining 20 years on.
Compared with current smokers, as each review defined its reference [11][12]; people who continued to smoke, and never smokers [13]; never-smokers [3]; continuing smokers, by age at stopping [14]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- The share of the reducible excess risk remaining was 81.4% 1 year after quitting, 57.2% at 5 years, 36.9% at 10, 26.7% at 15 and 19.7% at 20 [11]. Lung cancer death had an RR of 0.64 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.76) in people who had quit for under 10 years, 0.33 for 10 to 20 years and 0.16 for over 20 years, against 0.11 in never smokers [12]. Heavy former smokers had 39.1% lower lung cancer risk than continuing smokers within 5 years, yet a hazard ratio of 3.85 (95% CI 1.80 to 8.26) against never smokers after 25 years [13]. Women who stopped at 25 to 34 had a lung cancer death rate 1.84 times that of never-smokers [3]. For UK men who stopped at 60, 50, 40 or 30, the risk of dying of lung cancer by 75 was 10%, 6%, 3% and 2%, against 16% in continuing smokers [14].
- Population
- 49 prospective cohorts in 20 countries [11]. 969,560 people in 24 studies [12]. 8,907 Framingham participants with 284 lung cancers over a median 28.7 years [13]. 1.2 million UK women [3]. 982 lung cancer cases and 3,185 controls in 1990, with UK national rates [14].
- Sources
- [11], [12], [13], [3], [14]
- Caveats
- Observational. People who quit after symptoms begin can make early quitters look worse, which is reverse causation. In heavy smokers, 4 in 10 lung cancers occurred more than 15 years after quitting [13].
Quitting smoking, against nicotine replacement
Shown to help more people stop smoking for at least 6 months than nicotine replacement therapy, about 4 more quitters per 100, in high-certainty pooled trials.
Compared with nicotine replacement therapy [1]; conventional quit treatments, nicotine replacement or behavioral [2]; nicotine replacement therapy, across 14 reviews [3]; nicotine replacement therapy, in the largest single trial [4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Nicotine e-cigarettes raised quit rates against nicotine replacement therapy (RR 1.61, 95% CI 1.23 to 2.12, 11 studies, high-certainty evidence), about 4 more quitters per 100 (95% CI 1 to 7) [1]. A second meta-analysis found more biochemically confirmed abstinence than with conventional quit treatments (RR 1.77, 95% CI 1.29 to 2.44) [2]. Across 14 reviews, every pooled estimate favored nicotine e-cigarettes, with ratios typically 1.17 to 1.67 against nicotine replacement [3]. In the largest single trial, 1-year abstinence was 18.0% with e-cigarettes and 9.9% with nicotine replacement (RR 1.83, 95% CI 1.30 to 2.58), both with weekly behavioral support [4].
- Population
- 4,114 adults who smoked in 11 randomized trials, from 80 trials with 29,861 participants in all [1]. 3,253 adults in 5 trials of at least 6 months [2]. 14 reviews [3]. 886 adults at UK stop-smoking services [4].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3], [4]
- Caveats
- The trials tested regulated nicotine e-cigarettes. Illicit products or products with other substances such as THC may differ [1]. Heterogeneity was moderate (I² 55%) [1]. Most trials were in high-income countries [3].
Quitting smoking, against e-cigarettes without nicotine
Shown to help more people stop smoking than e-cigarettes without nicotine, about 2 more quitters per 100, in two meta-analyses of randomized trials.
Compared with e-cigarettes without nicotine [1][2]; non-nicotine e-cigarettes or placebo, across 14 reviews [3]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Nicotine e-cigarettes probably raised quit rates against e-cigarettes without nicotine (RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.69, 7 studies, moderate-certainty evidence), about 2 more quitters per 100 [1]. A second review found an RR of 1.56 (95% CI 1.13 to 2.15) [2]. Across 14 reviews, ratios against non-nicotine e-cigarettes typically ran 1.46 to 2.09 [3].
- Population
- 1,918 adults in 7 trials [1]. Adults in 5 trials of at least 6 months [2]. 14 reviews [3].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3]
- Caveats
- Evidence was downgraded for imprecision [1]. The two meta-analyses draw on overlapping trials, so their agreement is not fully independent.
Quick relief of airway narrowing in asthma
Shown to improve lung function more than a placebo inhaler in people with asthma, starting within about 5 minutes and lasting about 4 hours in responders.
Compared with a placebo inhaler [1]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In two 12-week trials, 2 inhalations of albuterol produced greater improvement in FEV1 from before the dose than placebo. In people whose FEV1 rose at least 15% within 30 minutes, the mean time to that rise was 5.4 minutes, peak effect came at 56 minutes, and the effect lasted about 4 hours, up to 6 hours in some [1].
- Population
- 610 people aged 12 and older with mild to moderate asthma in two randomized double-blind trials [1].
- Sources
- [1]
- Caveats
- Label trials. Some participants also used inhaled steroids [1].
57 more
Preventing exercise-induced airway narrowing
Shown to protect against the drop in lung function after exercise, with about 18 percentage points less fall in FEV1 than placebo after a single dose.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A single dose of a short- or long-acting beta-agonist before exercise reduced the maximum fall in FEV1 against placebo (MD -17.67%, 95% CI -19.51% to -15.84%). Side effects did not differ from placebo [2]. In a label trial, 2 inhalations of albuterol about 30 minutes before exercise prevented exercise-induced bronchospasm more than placebo [1].
- Population
- 53 trials with 1,139 participants, 45 of single doses [2]; 24 adults with asthma [1].
- Sources
- [2], [1]
- Caveats
- The meta-analysis pooled short- and long-acting beta-agonists, and heterogeneity was high in children [2].
Stable COPD
Shown to improve lung function slightly and daily breathlessness in stable COPD compared with placebo, and people preferred it to placebo about 9 times as often.
Compared with placebo [3]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Regular short-acting beta-agonists raised FEV1 by 0.14 L (95% CI 0.04 to 0.25) and FVC by 0.30 L, raised morning peak flow by 29 L/min, and improved daily breathlessness (SMD 1.33). Dropping out for treatment failure was about half as likely (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.73) [3].
- Population
- 13 crossover trials in people with stable COPD [3].
- Sources
- [3]
- Caveats
- Crossover trials of at least a week. The review predates the long-acting bronchodilators now used for COPD [3].
Continuous nebulized doses in a severe attack
Shown to cut hospital admission when beta-agonists were nebulized continuously rather than in separate doses in the emergency department, most in people with severe airway obstruction.
Compared with intermittent nebulized beta-agonist [5]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Continuous treatment lowered admission against intermittent treatment (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.5 to 0.9), and more in severe obstruction (RR 0.64). FEV1 (SMD 0.3) and peak flow (SMD 0.33) improved slightly more by 2 to 3 hours. Pulse rate and blood pressure did not differ [5].
- Population
- 461 patients with acute asthma in 8 trials [5].
- Sources
- [5]
- Caveats
- Small trials. The review covers beta-agonists given in emergency care [5].
Nortriptyline for quitting smoking
Shown to about double quit rates against placebo with nortriptyline in a Cochrane review of six trials.
Compared with placebo [14]; bupropion [14]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Nortriptyline raised smoking cessation against placebo (RR 2.03, 95% CI 1.48 to 2.78, I² 16%). Against bupropion, quit rates did not clearly differ (RR 1.30 favoring bupropion, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.82) [14].
- Population
- 975 smokers in six nortriptyline trials, within a review of 124 studies [14].
- Sources
- [14]
- Caveats
- The evidence is for nortriptyline, not amitriptyline. Nortriptyline is not approved for quitting smoking.
Sore throat
Shown to reduce sore throat at day 3 against placebo, with fewer than 6 treated for one extra person without it, though 82% on placebo were symptom-free by one week.
Compared with placebo or no treatment [3]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Sore throat at day 3 was less frequent on antibiotics (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.80), and at 1 week (RR 0.50), when the number needed to treat was 18. Fever at day 3 did not differ (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.07). Antibiotics lowered ear infections within 14 days (Peto OR 0.21), quinsy (Peto OR 0.16) and acute rheumatic fever (Peto OR 0.36), but not sinusitis [3].
- Population
- 15,337 cases of sore throat in 29 trials, mostly adults [3].
- Sources
- [3]
- Caveats
- Most trials were run in the 1950s, when complications such as rheumatic fever were far more frequent. Few trials separated bacterial from viral sore throat, and harms were poorly reported [3].
Preventing COPD flare-ups with long-term azithromycin
Shown to cut COPD flare-ups with long-term macrolides such as azithromycin, from 61% to 47% of people, 8 treated for one fewer, with hearing loss reported on azithromycin.
Compared with placebo [14]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- People with one or more exacerbations fell from 61% to 47% (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.78), a number needed to treat of 8 over 3 to 12 months, and yearly exacerbations fell (rate ratio 0.67). Quality of life improved by less than the clinically important margin (MD -1.94 on the St George's questionnaire). Hospital admissions, lung function, serious adverse events and deaths did not differ. Azithromycin was linked to hearing loss, often reversible [14].
- Population
- 3,932 people in 14 trials, mean age 65 to 72, mostly moderate to severe COPD with frequent flare-ups [14].
- Sources
- [14]
- Caveats
- The benefit applies to macrolides taken at least three times a week. Resistance rose in some studies [14].
VO2 max and endurance
Shown to raise VO2 max and aerobic endurance in healthy adults and athletes, though results varied widely across small trials.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 4 RCTs (142 participants), VO2 max rose by a mean 3.00 (95% CI 0.18 to 5.82) with high heterogeneity [10]. A Bayesian meta-analysis of 12 trials reported ashwagandha outperformed placebo on cardiorespiratory fitness [11]. A 2026 three-level meta-analysis of 13 trials found overall exercise performance improved (Hedges' g 0.47, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.69, I² 60%), most consistently for aerobic endurance (g 0.54, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.85) [12].
- Population
- Healthy adults and athletes [10][11]. 599 participants, mainly young adults or athletes [12].
- Sources
- [10], [11], [12]
- Caveats
- The 95% prediction interval for overall performance ran from -0.40 to 1.33, crossing zero [12]. The Bayesian abstract does not report effect sizes [11].
Colds and upper respiratory infections (yeast beta-glucan)
Shown to lower the odds of colds and shorten them in healthy people taking yeast beta-glucan, across few trials with high heterogeneity.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 13 trials in healthy people, yeast beta-glucan lowered the odds of an upper respiratory infection (OR 0.345, 95% CI 0.192 to 0.620), the number of episodes (SMD -0.315) and their duration (SMD -0.312) compared with placebo [9]. A review of 34 trials of fungal beta-glucans at 2.5 to 1,000 mg a day for up to 6.5 months reported fewer respiratory infection symptoms, but immune cell and molecular findings were inconsistent [10].
- Population
- Healthy subjects [9]. Healthy people and patients [10].
- Sources
- [9], [10]
- Caveats
- Heterogeneity was high and the trials were few [9]. A review of commercial beta-glucan products found an average of 33 participants per arm, and more than half of trials that reported funding were sponsored by beta-glucan producers [11].
Death in people hospitalized with pneumonia or pancreatitis
Linked to more deaths in hospital patients: a BUN of 20 mg/dL or above went with 4.6 times the odds of death in acute pancreatitis.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 1,043 cases of acute pancreatitis from 3 cohorts, a BUN of 20 mg/dL or higher at admission went with an odds ratio for death of 4.6 (95% CI 2.5 to 8.3), and any rise in BUN at 24 hours with an odds ratio of 4.3 (2.3 to 7.9) [10]. In 1,068 adults hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia, urea above 7 mmol/L (a BUN above about 20 mg/dL) became one of the five items of the CURB-65 severity score, in which 30-day mortality ran from 0.7% at a score of 0 to 57% at a score of 5 [11].
- Population
- 1,043 cases of acute pancreatitis in US and Dutch cohorts [10]. 1,068 patients with pneumonia in the UK, New Zealand and the Netherlands, mean age 64 [11].
- Sources
- [10], [11]
- Caveats
- Observational, in people acutely ill in hospital. These cut points are not reference ranges for people who are well. The pneumonia study reports urea in mmol/L, and the mg/dL figure here is converted with the factor on this page.
Quitting smoking
Shown to raise quit rates against placebo, with about 1.9 times the odds, in a Cochrane review of six small trials, with frequent dry mouth and sedation.
Compared with placebo [8]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- The pooled odds ratio for quitting with clonidine against placebo was 1.89 (95% CI 1.30 to 2.74). Only one of the six trials was significant on its own. Dose-dependent side effects, particularly dry mouth and sedation, were frequent [8].
- Population
- Smokers in six trials, three of oral and three of patch clonidine, most with counseling [8].
- Sources
- [8]
- Caveats
- Few trials, with potential sources of bias [8]. Clonidine is not approved for quitting smoking.
Preventing repeat clots after the first months of treatment
Shown to cut repeat venous clots to 1.7% against 8.8% on placebo over a year with apixaban, and to 1.2% to 1.5% against 4.4% on aspirin with rivaroxaban.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- After 6 to 12 months of earlier treatment, recurrent venous thromboembolism or related death occurred in 1.7% on apixaban 2.5 mg and 1.7% on 5 mg against 8.8% on placebo, a difference of about 7 percentage points. Major bleeding occurred in 0.2%, 0.1% and 0.5% [10]. With rivaroxaban, recurrence occurred in 1.5% on 20 mg and 1.2% on 10 mg against 4.4% on aspirin (HR 0.34 and 0.26), with major bleeding in 0.5%, 0.4% and 0.3% [11].
- Population
- 2,482 patients who had completed 6 to 12 months of anticoagulation [10]; 3,365 patients with venous thromboembolism treated a median 351 days [11].
- Sources
- [10], [11]
- Caveats
- The band above is the absolute difference of about 7 in 100 in the apixaban trial. Both trials were funded by the manufacturers and enrolled people for whom continued treatment was an open question.
Respiratory infections
Shown to lower respiratory infections by about 19% with probiotic fermented dairy against placebo, in one meta-analysis of 22 trials across ages.
Compared with placebo [4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Probiotic fermented dairy lowered respiratory tract infections overall (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.89), in children (RR 0.82), adults (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.00) and older people (RR 0.78). Upper respiratory infections fell (RR 0.83), the common cold fell (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.96), and lower respiratory infections fell marginally (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.01) [4].
- Population
- 10,190 participants in 22 randomized trials [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- The products were dairy foods with added probiotic strains, so this may not apply to other fermented foods. The adult estimate's interval reaches 1.00.
Adding a long-acting bronchodilator (combination inhalers) in asthma
Shown to cut asthma exacerbations needing oral steroids from 15% to 11% when a long-acting beta-agonist was added to an inhaled steroid in adults.
Compared with the same dose of inhaled steroid alone [4][5]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Adding a long-acting beta-agonist cut exacerbations needing oral steroids from 15% to 11% (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.87), cut rescue use by 0.58 puffs a day and halved withdrawals for poor control (RR 0.50). In children the estimate was not significant (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.39) [4]. In four 26-week safety trials, at least one asthma exacerbation occurred in 9.8% on a combination inhaler and 11.7% on an inhaled steroid alone (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.89) [5].
- Population
- 21,248 participants, 4,625 of them children, in 77 trials [4]; 36,010 people aged 12 and older [5].
- Sources
- [4], [5]
- Caveats
- Higher than usual doses of the long-acting beta-agonist gave less benefit [4].
As-needed budesonide-formoterol in mild asthma
Shown to cut exacerbations needing oral steroids by about half against a reliever alone in mild asthma, and to match regular inhaled steroids with less steroid taken.
Compared with an as-needed fast-acting bronchodilator alone [6]; as-needed albuterol [7]; regular inhaled steroid with an as-needed reliever [6][7]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Against a fast-acting reliever alone, exacerbations needing oral steroids fell from 109 to 52 per 1,000 (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.60). Against regular inhaled steroids, they were 65 and 81 per 1,000 (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.07), with 154 μg a day less inhaled steroid [6]. In one 52-week trial, the annual exacerbation rate was 0.195 on budesonide-formoterol as needed and 0.400 on albuterol as needed (relative rate 0.49), and did not differ from regular budesonide (relative rate 1.12, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.79) [7].
- Population
- 9,657 participants aged 12 and older in 6 trials, mean age 36 to 43 [6]; 668 adults with mild asthma [7].
- Sources
- [6], [7]
- Caveats
- All trials used budesonide 200 μg with formoterol 6 μg in a dry powder inhaler [6]. One trial was open-label and part funded by AstraZeneca [7].
One combination inhaler for both daily control and relief (SMART)
Shown to cut asthma exacerbations by about a third against fixed-dose combination controllers, 6.4 fewer per 100 people aged 12 and older.
Compared with the same or higher dose of inhaled steroid and long-acting beta-agonist as controller, or inhaled steroid alone [8]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In people aged 12 and older, using one budesonide-formoterol inhaler for both control and relief lowered exacerbation risk against the same controller dose (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.80, risk difference -6.4%) and a higher controller dose (RR 0.77, risk difference -2.8%). In children aged 4 to 11, risk fell against a higher steroid dose (RR 0.55) and against the same combination dose (RR 0.38) [8].
- Population
- 22,748 patients in 16 randomized trials, 341 of them aged 4 to 11 [8].
- Sources
- [8]
- Caveats
- 15 of the 16 trials tested budesonide-formoterol. The children's results rest on few patients [8].
Flare-ups in COPD, inhaled steroid alone
Shown to reduce COPD exacerbations by about 0.2 to 0.3 a year and slow the decline in quality of life, with no effect on deaths.
Compared with placebo [9]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Long-term inhaled steroids lowered the exacerbation rate (MD -0.26 per person per year, 95% CI -0.37 to -0.14) and slowed the decline in quality of life (MD -1.22 units a year). They did not consistently slow FEV1 decline (MD 5.80 mL a year, 95% CI -0.28 to 11.88) and did not change mortality (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.16) [9].
- Population
- 16,154 participants with COPD in 55 trials [9].
- Sources
- [9]
- Caveats
- One large trial found a significant slowing of FEV1 decline, but the pooled results were inconsistent [9].
Combination inhaler against a long-acting bronchodilator alone in COPD
Shown to lower COPD exacerbations to about 0.76 a year per 1 a year on a long-acting beta-agonist alone, with no difference in deaths and more pneumonia.
Compared with the same long-acting beta-agonist alone [10]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Combination inhalers lowered the exacerbation rate (rate ratio 0.76, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.84). Mortality did not differ (OR 0.92). Pneumonia was more common (OR 1.55) [10].
- Population
- 11,794 people with severe COPD in 14 trials, 10 of fluticasone-salmeterol and 4 of budesonide-formoterol [10].
- Sources
- [10]
- Caveats
- Low-quality evidence for exacerbations, with high withdrawal rates and heterogeneity (I² 68%) [10].
Asthma, against placebo
Shown to improve lung function, daytime symptoms and night waking against placebo in mild to moderate asthma, with FEV1 up 0.22 L more than placebo in one trial.
Compared with placebo [1]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Over 12 weeks, FEV1 rose 13.0% on montelukast 10 mg and 4.2% on placebo, a difference of 0.22 L (95% CI 0.17 to 0.27). In the second trial, daytime symptom scores fell 0.49 against 0.26, rescue inhaler use fell 1.65 against 0.42 puffs a day, and night waking fell 2.03 against 0.78 times a week [1].
- Population
- 1,576 adults and adolescents aged 15 and older with mild or moderate asthma in two 12-week trials, 795 on montelukast and 530 on placebo [1].
- Sources
- [1]
- Caveats
- Label trials. Doses above 10 mg a day gave no added benefit [1].
Asthma, added to an inhaled steroid
Shown to halve exacerbations needing oral steroids when added to an inhaled steroid in adults and adolescents, about 22 treated for one fewer exacerbation.
Compared with the same dose of inhaled steroid alone [3]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Adding an anti-leukotriene to the same inhaled steroid dose halved the number of people with exacerbations needing oral steroids (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.86), a number needed to treat of 22 over 6 to 16 weeks. All adverse events did not differ (RR 1.06) [3].
- Population
- 6,128 adults and adolescents in 37 studies, 24 of montelukast; 815 people in the 4 studies of the main outcome [3].
- Sources
- [3]
- Caveats
- Moderate-quality evidence from few studies for the main outcome. Zafirlukast and pranlukast trials are included [3].
Exercise-induced airway narrowing
Shown to reduce the drop in lung function after exercise when taken 2 hours before, a 13% fall against 22% on placebo, with less protection at 24 hours.
Compared with placebo [1]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In one crossover trial, the mean maximum fall in FEV1 after exercise 2 hours after a 10 mg dose was 13% on montelukast and 22% on placebo (difference -9%, 95% CI -12 to -5). At 24 hours the falls were 10% and 14%. Some patients were protected at 8.5 and 24 hours and some were not [1].
- Population
- 160 people aged 15 and older with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in three crossover trials, 47 in the trial reported [1].
- Sources
- [1]
- Caveats
- Label trials with single doses. The label reports the other two trials as similar [1].
COPD flare-ups
Shown to cut treatment failure in COPD flare-ups by about half, with 9 treated to prevent one, and no change in deaths.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Systemic corticosteroids lowered treatment failure against placebo (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.67), a number needed to treat of 9 (95% CI 7 to 14), and lowered relapse by 1 month (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.97). Hospital stay was 1.22 days shorter. Deaths within 30 days did not differ (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.66). Adverse events were more frequent (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.59 to 3.43), one extra for every 6 treated, and high blood sugar was more frequent (OR 2.79, 95% CI 1.86 to 4.19). Oral and injected treatment did not differ in treatment failure, relapse or deaths [3].
- Population
- 1,787 people in 16 studies, mean age 68, with a median treatment length of 14 days [3].
- Sources
- [3]
- Caveats
- Lung function was better at 72 hours and not at later time points [3].
Sore throat
Shown to raise the share with sore throat pain relieved at 24 hours by 12 percentage points after one low dose, mostly of dexamethasone.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- After a single low dose, most often oral dexamethasone at up to 10 mg, people were about twice as likely to have pain relief at 24 hours (RR 2.2, 95% CI 1.2 to 4.3, risk difference 12.4%) and 1.5 times as likely to have no pain at 48 hours (RR 1.5, 95% CI 1.3 to 1.8, risk difference 18.3%). Pain relief began 4.8 hours earlier on average. Six of the 9 trials that looked for adverse events reported none [11].
- Population
- 1,426 people with sore throat in 10 trials [11].
- Sources
- [11]
- Caveats
- The trials gave one dose and did not assess repeated courses [11].
Croup in children
Shown to lower croup symptom scores in children within 2 to 12 hours against placebo, with fewer return visits on dexamethasone than on prednisolone.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Against placebo, glucocorticoids lowered croup scores at 2 hours (SMD -0.65, 95% CI -1.13 to -0.18), 6 hours (SMD -0.76, 95% CI -1.12 to -0.40) and 12 hours (SMD -1.03, 95% CI -1.53 to -0.53). Prednisolone and dexamethasone did not differ in croup score at 2 hours. Return visits or admissions were about half as frequent on dexamethasone (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.11), and fewer children on dexamethasone needed additional glucocorticoid (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.97) [12].
- Population
- 5,888 children with croup in 45 trials [12].
- Sources
- [12]
- Caveats
- The reviewers rated the evidence against placebo low certainty and judged 98% of studies at high or unclear risk of bias. The interval for return visits includes no difference [12].
Severe COVID-19 and pneumonia in hospital
Shown to lower 28-day deaths in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, 22.9% against 25.7%, with the benefit limited to those on oxygen or a ventilator.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Dexamethasone 6 mg a day for up to 10 days, by mouth or vein, lowered 28-day deaths from 25.7% on usual care to 22.9% (rate ratio 0.83, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.93). Deaths were 29.3% against 41.4% in those on a ventilator and 23.3% against 26.2% in those on oxygen. In those on no respiratory support they were 17.8% against 14.0% (rate ratio 1.19, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.55) [13]. In severe community-acquired pneumonia, added corticosteroids lowered deaths (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.3 to 0.74) and C-reactive protein on day 8 (SMD -0.8, 95% CI -1.11 to -0.5), with no difference in gastrointestinal bleeding or high blood sugar [14].
- Population
- 6,425 people hospitalized with COVID-19, 2,104 on dexamethasone and 4,321 on usual care [13]; 665 people with severe community-acquired pneumonia in 10 trials [14].
- Sources
- [13], [14]
- Caveats
- The COVID-19 trial was open label [13]. The pneumonia trials were small and used several corticosteroids and dosing schedules, so they do not test oral treatment alone [14].
Obstructive sleep apnea
Shown to cut sleep apnea events by about 13 to 25 per hour more than placebo in adults with obesity, with smaller drops in those with type 2 diabetes.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- At 80 weeks, in people without diabetes, the apnea-hypopnea index fell by 13.2 (4 mg), 24.7 (9 mg) and 22.5 (12 mg) events per hour more than placebo by intention to treat. In people with type 2 diabetes the differences were 8.8, 13.9 and 15.0 events per hour [8].
- Population
- 243 adults without diabetes (baseline 58.6 events per hour) and 448 with type 2 diabetes (55.9 events per hour), with moderate to severe sleep apnea and BMI of 27 or more [8].
- Sources
- [8]
- Caveats
- Two trials nested inside the larger weight trials, both funded by Eli Lilly [8].
Asthma, against no breathing training
Shown in a Cochrane review to improve asthma quality of life slightly at 3 months against inactive controls. Asthma symptom scores and FEV1 in liters did not clearly change.
Compared with inactive control groups [15]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Asthma quality of life improved at 3 months (MD 0.42 points, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.68, 4 studies, 974 participants, moderate certainty). Hyperventilation symptoms fell at 4 to 6 months (MD -3.22) but not at 6 months. Asthma Control Questionnaire scores were inconclusive (MD -0.08 over 6 months, 95% CI -0.22 to 0.07). FEV1 in liters was inconclusive (MD -0.10 L, very low certainty), while FEV1 % of predicted improved by 6.88% [15].
- Population
- 2,880 adult outpatients with mild to moderate asthma in 22 trials, 14 of them of yoga breathing [15].
- Sources
- [15]
- Caveats
- Trials differed in technique, sessions and outcomes, and most reported their methods incompletely. Adverse effects were not assessed [15].
Lung function and COPD after quitting
Shown to slow the yearly loss of lung function to about half the rate of continued smoking, in a large trial of smokers with early airway obstruction.
Compared with people who continued to smoke [15][16]; usual care, in the randomized comparison [16]; never smokers, with current and former smokers each set against them [17]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- People who quit gained an average 47 mL (2%) of FEV1 in the year after quitting. Their later decline was 31 mL a year against 62 mL in continuing smokers [15]. At 11 years, men who quit lost 30.2 mL a year and women 21.5 mL, against 66.1 mL and 54.2 mL in continuing smokers. FEV1 was under 60% of predicted in 38% of continuing smokers and 10% of sustained quitters. The intervention group as randomized lost less lung function than usual care [16]. In pooled studies, COPD risk against never smokers was 3.51 (95% CI 3.08 to 3.99) in current smokers and 2.35 (95% CI 2.11 to 2.63) in ex-smokers, and limited data showed it falling with longer quitting [17].
- Population
- 3,926 smokers, mean age 48.5, with mild to moderate airway obstruction in 10 centers [15]. 77.4% of surviving participants at 11 years [16]. 133 studies of COPD [17].
- Sources
- [15], [16], [17]
- Caveats
- The comparison of quitters with continuing smokers is not randomized, since people chose whether to quit [15][16]. The pooled COPD estimates were markedly heterogeneous [17].
COVID-19 in hospital
Shown to lower death, ventilation and worsening in patients with COVID-19 when added to standard care, about 61% fewer deaths, in small trials.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 23 RCTs (1,407 patients), turmeric added to standard care lowered all-cause death (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.67, 8 RCTs, moderate certainty), need for intubation or mechanical ventilation (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.72) and clinical deterioration (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.59) [40].
- Population
- Patients with mild to severe COVID-19, hospitalized in 17 of 23 trials. Nano-curcumin at 160 to 240 mg a day was the most common form [40].
- Sources
- [40]
- Caveats
- Nine trials were at high risk of bias. Results held when those were excluded [40]. The trials were small.
Quitting smoking, against behavioral support or no support
Shown to help more people stop smoking than behavioral support alone or no support, in pooled trials rated low in certainty because of risk of bias.
Compared with behavioral support only or no support [1]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Quit rates were higher with nicotine e-cigarettes than with behavioral support only or no support (RR 1.75, 95% CI 1.39 to 2.20, 11 studies, low-certainty evidence) [1].
- Population
- 7,214 adults who smoked in 11 trials [1].
- Sources
- [1]
- Caveats
- People in these trials knew whether they were given a device, and the review rated the evidence low in certainty for that reason [1].
Treating and preventing venous clots
Shown to cut repeat venous clots by about 95% against placebo when continued after three months, in one trial of first unprovoked clots.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- After three months of treatment for a first unprovoked venous thromboembolism, 17 of 83 people on placebo had a recurrence (27.4% per patient-year) against 1 of 79 who continued warfarin (1.3% per patient-year), a 95% reduction (95% CI 63 to 99). Three people on warfarin had nonfatal major bleeding against none on placebo [7]. Across six trials of acute venous thromboembolism, recurrence occurred in 2.2% on a vitamin K antagonist and 2.0% on a DOAC (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.06), with more major bleeding on the vitamin K antagonist [8].
- Population
- 162 patients followed an average 10 months [7]; 27,023 patients in six trials [8].
- Sources
- [7], [8]
- Caveats
- The placebo-controlled trial was small and stopped early for benefit [7].
Cardiorespiratory fitness with tracker use
Shown to raise fitness modestly across systematic reviews of activity tracker trials. One crossover study found a 1.5 mL/kg/min rise in estimated fitness over 8 weeks.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- An umbrella review of 39 systematic reviews and meta-analyses found activity trackers improved fitness (SMD 0.3) and physical activity (SMD 0.3 to 0.6) [18]. In 50 inactive adults who followed their activity on a Garmin Vivosmart 4 for 8 weeks after a 4-week control period, estimated cardiorespiratory fitness rose by 1.52 mL/kg/min (95% CI 0.82 to 2.22) and daily steps by 982 (95% CI 492 to 1,471). Blood pressure did not change [19].
- Population
- 163,992 participants across 39 reviews [18]. 62 inactive adults recruited, 50 completed, mean age 48, 84% women [19].
- Sources
- [18], [19]
- Caveats
- These trials tested wearing an activity tracker, not seeing a VO2 max number. In the crossover study, participants were also instructed to reach 150 intensity minutes a week, there was no randomized control group, and fitness was reported as an estimate [19].
Length of a cold, zinc started at onset
Shown to shorten colds about 2.4 days when started at onset, in low-certainty evidence from children and adults.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In treatment trials, zinc shortened colds by a mean 2.37 days (95% CI -4.21 to -0.53, I² 97%, 8 studies, 972 participants, low certainty) [1]. In 7 lozenge trials using more than 75 mg a day, colds were 33% shorter (95% CI 21% to 45%). Acetate and gluconate lozenges did not differ significantly, and 192 to 207 mg a day did not outperform 80 to 92 mg a day [2].
- Population
- 34 trials with 8,526 children and adults [1]; 575 adults with natural colds [2].
- Sources
- [1], [2]
- Caveats
- Heterogeneity was very high and most trials were at unclear or high risk of bias [1]. The single-author lozenge analysis [2] selected trials by dose.
Colds
Limited evidence: in children with nephrotic syndrome, astragalus granules were tied to fewer upper respiratory infections. A Cochrane review found no placebo-controlled trial for preventing them in children.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A Cochrane review screened 120 full-text papers on oral astragalus to prevent frequent respiratory infections in children and found no randomized trial comparing astragalus alone with placebo, so it could not assess benefit or safety. 44 studies were excluded for having no placebo [10]. In two studies pooled for children with nephrotic syndrome, upper respiratory tract infections occurred in 23.9% given astragalus granules with prednisone against 42.9% on prednisone alone (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.93), with evidence quality rated low [11].
- Population
- Children up to 14 years in community settings [10]. Children with nephrotic syndrome taking prednisone [11].
- Sources
- [10], [11]
- Caveats
- Evidence quality was low, and the comparison was against prednisone alone with no placebo [11]. No trial in adults with colds was located.
Lung disease and death from any cause
One UK cohort of 504,206 adults linked higher bilirubin within the usual range to less lung cancer, less chronic obstructive lung disease and fewer deaths.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- For each 0.1 mg/dL higher bilirubin, the adjusted rate of lung cancer was 8% lower in men (95% CI 5% to 11%) and 11% lower in women (7% to 14%). In men the rate of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was 6% lower (5% to 7%) and the death rate 3% lower (2% to 3%), with very similar results in women. Median bilirubin was 0.64 mg/dL in men and 0.53 mg/dL in women [8].
- Population
- 504,206 adults in a UK primary care database with no evidence of liver, bile duct or hemolytic disease, with 1,341 lung cancers, 5,863 cases of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and 23,103 deaths [8].
- Sources
- [8]
- Caveats
- One cohort, observational, in people whose bilirubin was within the normal range [8]. Bilirubin was lower in active smokers in US survey data, so how fully smoking was accounted for matters to this result [5].
Asthma control
Limited evidence: 4 trials found better asthma control scores and lung function in people with asthma. Peak flow did not change.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 4 RCTs, Nigella sativa raised asthma control test scores (SMD 0.50, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.88) and FEV1 (SMD 1.84, 95% CI 0.07 to 3.60). Peak flow, IL-4 and interferon gamma did not change significantly [8].
- Population
- People with asthma in 4 RCTs [8].
- Sources
- [8]
- Caveats
- Four trials, with a wide interval for FEV1.
Cold and upper respiratory symptoms
Small trials found fewer cold days in air travelers, 57 against 117 on placebo. A review rated the evidence uncertain.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A meta-analysis of 180 participants reported a large reduction in upper respiratory symptoms with elderberry [1]. A systematic review of 5 randomized trials found elderberry may reduce cold duration and severity, with uncertain evidence [2]. In 312 air travelers, cold days totaled 57 on elderberry and 117 on placebo, and summed symptom scores 247 against 583 [3].
- Population
- 180 participants [1], 5 RCTs [2], 312 economy-class passengers flying from Australia [3].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3]
- Caveats
- The meta-analysis abstract gives no effect size or trial count. It was funded by the Franklin Institute of Wellness [1]. The air travel trial was funded by Iprona AG, which supplied the capsules and was partly involved in design [3].
Common cold
One trial found 24 colds on garlic against 65 on placebo over 12 weeks. Days to recovery were similar.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A Cochrane review found only one eligible trial. Its 146 participants on a daily garlic supplement for 12 weeks reported 24 colds against 65 on placebo, and 111 against 366 days of illness. Days to recovery were similar, 4.63 against 5.63 [9].
- Population
- 146 adults in one trial [9].
- Sources
- [9]
- Caveats
- One trial with self-reported colds. The review authors found the evidence insufficient [9].
Colds
One trial found fewer colds and fewer cold days over 4 months on a North American ginseng extract in adults prone to colds.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 279 adults with at least 2 colds in the prior year, an extract of North American ginseng taken for 4 months lowered colds per person (0.68 vs 0.93), the share with 2 or more colds (10.0% vs 22.8%) and days with cold symptoms (10.8 vs 16.5) [8].
- Population
- Adults aged 18 to 65 in Edmonton, Canada [8].
- Sources
- [8]
- Caveats
- One trial of one polysaccharide-rich extract. 44 people who never started treatment were excluded from analysis [8].
Energy and immunity
One trial found a fruit and vegetable juice powder cut days with moderate or severe cold symptoms by 20% in hospital staff. No trial measuring energy was located.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 529 healthcare workers given encapsulated fruit and vegetable juice powder (Juice Plus+) or placebo daily for 8 months, days with moderate or severe cold symptoms over 6 months averaged 7.6 against 9.5 (p = 0.023). Total days with any cold symptom did not differ, 29.4 against 30.7 (p = 0.616) [11].
- Population
- 529 hospital staff in Berlin aged 18 to 65, mostly nurses, 80% women [11].
- Sources
- [11]
- Caveats
- One trial of one encapsulated fruit and vegetable product, not a greens drink powder. Symptoms were self-reported in diaries, and the effect was limited to more severe symptom days [11]. No trial of AG1 or other greens blends measured energy, fatigue or infections.
Aerobic fitness in athletes
One sham-controlled trial found higher VO2 max after 40 sessions in middle-aged master athletes, with 31 of 37 randomized participants analyzed.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Compared with sham, 40 sessions at 2 ATA raised maximal oxygen consumption (p = 0.010, effect size 0.989) and oxygen consumption at the anaerobic threshold (effect size 0.837). Measures of mitochondrial respiration and mitochondrial mass in muscle also rose [15].
- Population
- 37 healthy master athletes aged 40 to 50, of whom 16 hyperbaric and 15 sham participants were analyzed [15].
- Sources
- [15]
- Caveats
- One small trial with 6 randomized participants missing from the analysis. The abstract reports effect sizes without the size of the VO2 max change.
Severe asthma attacks in recent-onset mild asthma
One large trial found low-dose budesonide cut the risk of a severe asthma exacerbation by 44% over 3 years in mild persistent asthma of recent onset.
Compared with placebo [3]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- At least one severe asthma exacerbation occurred in 117 of 3,597 people on budesonide and 198 of 3,568 on placebo (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.71) [3].
- Population
- 7,241 people in 32 countries who had had mild persistent asthma for under 2 years and no regular steroid treatment [3].
- Sources
- [3]
- Caveats
- Children under 11 grew 1.34 cm less over 3 years (see Risks) [3].
- Why limited
- This rests on one trial, of 7,241 people. Strength counts independent studies that agree, so one trial is limited at any size.
Sleep apnea and snoring in children
Small trials found montelukast improved sleep study measures, snoring and mouth breathing in children with mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea over short periods.
Compared with placebo [7]; nasal mometasone alone [7]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Against placebo, oral montelukast improved polysomnography measures, snoring, mouth breathing and adenoid size. Added to mometasone nasal spray, it improved sleep study measures and snoring more than the spray alone [7].
- Population
- 305 children with mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea in 4 randomized trials [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- Four small short-term trials. The abstract gives no effect sizes [7].
Snoring
Small uncontrolled studies found snoring fell by about half or more with mouth tape or an oral patch in people with mild sleep apnea.
Compared with before taping, in the same people [1][2]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 20 mouth breathers, the median snoring index fell from 303.8 to 121.1 events an hour, and 13 of 20 (65%) cut their snoring index by at least half [1]. With a porous oral patch, the median snoring index fell from 146.7 to 40.0 an hour, snoring loudness from 49.1 to 41.1 dB, and self-rated snoring from 7.5 to 2.4 on a 10-point scale [2]. A scoping review notes one study in people without sleep apnea that reported less snoring with tape combined with other measures [5].
- Population
- 20 adults [1]. 30 patients [2]. 9 studies [5].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [5]
- Caveats
- No control group, and the responder share comes from 20 people. Participants were selected because they tolerated tape [1].
CPAP use in mouth breathers with sleep apnea
One crossover trial of 62 CPAP users who breathed through the mouth found tape added about 52 minutes of nightly CPAP use and eased daytime sleepiness and dryness.
Compared with CPAP without mouth tape for 30 days [6]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- With silicone mouth tape, average CPAP use rose by 51.8 minutes a day (95% CI 33.1 to 70.4), nights with 4 or more hours of use rose by 17.6%, and the odds of meeting the trial's adherence target were 4.5 times higher. Epworth sleepiness scores, snoring, mouth and throat dryness and night awakenings improved [6]. A scoping review cites a study in which tape reduced mouth leak during bilevel ventilation [5].
- Population
- 62 adults with obstructive sleep apnea on CPAP, mean age 58, mean apnea-hypopnea index 45.8 [6].
- Sources
- [6], [5]
- Caveats
- One trial. Adverse effects were reported, and the abstract does not say which [6]. This is tape used with a CPAP machine, not tape alone.
Exercise in low oxygen or at altitude
Small trials found sildenafil raised exercise capacity only at very low oxygen, about 3,900 m and above, with no change at lower altitudes.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Results differ by trial. Breathing 10% oxygen at low altitude, sildenafil 50 mg raised maximum workload to 172.5 W against 130.6 W on placebo. At Mount Everest base camp it also raised maximum workload and lowered pulmonary artery pressure [3]. At a simulated 3,874 m, sildenafil cut 6 km time-trial time by 15%. Responders improved 39% and nonresponders 1.0% [4]. At simulated altitudes of about 2,100 m and 3,900 m, sildenafil 50 mg did not change peak power or 15 km time-trial times, though oxygen saturation was 3% higher at the higher altitude [5].
- Population
- 14 healthy mountaineers and trekkers [3]; 10 trained men [4]; 11 trained men and 10 trained women [5].
- Sources
- [3], [4], [5]
- Caveats
- Small crossover trials of single doses. The positive results came from very low oxygen levels (about 3,900 m and above). The authors of [5] state benefits are unlikely below 4,000 m.
Walking distance in pulmonary arterial hypertension
One trial found walking distance rose about 45 to 50 m more than placebo over 12 weeks in people with pulmonary arterial hypertension.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- After 12 weeks, six-minute walk distance rose by 45 m, 46 m and 50 m more than placebo on 20, 40 and 80 mg three times daily. Mean pulmonary artery pressure fell and functional class improved. Clinical worsening did not differ from placebo [6].
- Population
- 278 patients with symptomatic pulmonary arterial hypertension [6].
- Sources
- [6]
- Caveats
- One trial, not powered for mortality. It describes people with the disease, not healthy athletes.
Breathlessness and physical function in advanced breast cancer
One trial of 385 women found less breathlessness with reflexology than with lay foot manipulation or conventional care, and better physical functioning than conventional care.
Compared with lay foot manipulation [6]; conventional care [6]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Shortness of breath was less severe with reflexology than with conventional care (P < 0.01) and lay foot manipulation (P = 0.02). Physical functioning improved more than with conventional care (P = 0.04). Breast cancer quality of life, depression, anxiety, pain and nausea did not differ [6].
- Population
- 385 women with advanced breast cancer receiving chemotherapy or hormone therapy [6].
- Sources
- [6]
- Caveats
- One trial with several outcomes, most of which did not differ.
Aerobic fitness when added to exercise
One trial found estimated VO2 max rose 2.7 mL/kg/min more when a 15-minute sauna followed each exercise session for 8 weeks, in 47 sedentary adults.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Estimated VO2 max rose 2.7 mL/kg/min more (95% CI 0.2 to 5.3) with exercise plus sauna than with exercise alone. Exercise alone raised it 6.2 mL/kg/min (95% CI 4.2 to 8.3) over the control group [3].
- Population
- 47 adults aged 49 ± 9 with low physical activity and at least one cardiovascular risk factor, randomized to exercise plus sauna, exercise or control for 8 weeks [3].
- Sources
- [3]
- Caveats
- One trial of about 16 people per group. VO2 max was estimated, not measured by gas analysis. There was no sauna-only group.
Pneumonia and respiratory disease
Linked to fewer hospital diagnoses of pneumonia and other respiratory disease in Finnish men who used a sauna 2 or more times a week.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Over 25.6 years, 379 of 1,935 men had a hospital diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma or pneumonia. Against one session a week or fewer, hazard ratios were 0.73 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.92) at 2 to 3 sessions and 0.59 (95% CI 0.37 to 0.94) at 4 or more [17]. For pneumonia alone, in 2,210 men with 375 cases, the fully adjusted hazard ratios were 0.72 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.90) and 0.63 (95% CI 0.39 to 1.00) [18].
- Population
- Finnish men aged 42 to 61 [17][18].
- Sources
- [17], [18]
- Caveats
- Observational, and both analyses use the same cohort. Only men were studied.
Common colds
One trial found fewer colds over 6 months in 25 people who took regular saunas than in 25 who did not. Duration and severity did not differ.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- The sauna group had significantly fewer episodes of common cold over 6 months. In the last 3 months the incidence was roughly half that of controls. Mean duration and severity of colds did not differ between groups [19].
- Population
- 50 volunteers, 25 taking regular saunas and 25 abstaining, followed for 6 months [19].
- Sources
- [19]
- Caveats
- One small trial from 1990. The abstract gives no exact counts and does not say that allocation was randomized or that anyone was blinded.
Blood pressure, resistance breathing training against sham
One trial of 36 adults found 30 daily breaths against high resistance lowered systolic pressure from 135 to 126 mm Hg over 6 weeks. Sham training did not.
Compared with low-resistance sham training [11]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- High-resistance inspiratory muscle strength training at 75% of maximal inspiratory pressure lowered casual systolic pressure from 135 to 126 mm Hg (P < 0.01), about 75% of which remained 6 weeks after training stopped, and diastolic pressure from 79 to 77 mm Hg (P = 0.03). Twenty-four hour systolic pressure was lower after training than after sham (P = 0.01). Blood pressure did not change with sham training at 15% of maximum. Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation rose about 45% [11].
- Population
- 36 adults aged 50 to 79 with systolic pressure of 120 mm Hg or higher, 18 per group [11].
- Sources
- [11]
- Caveats
- One small double-blind trial using a handheld resistance device. This is strength training of the breathing muscles, not slow breathing [11].
Asthma, against asthma education
One trial of 183 adults found physiotherapist breathing training improved asthma quality of life and anxiety more than nurse asthma education at 6 months, not at 1 month.
Compared with nurse-delivered asthma education, to control for clinician attention [16]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- At 6 months, breathing training improved asthma quality of life by 0.38 units more than education (95% CI 0.08 to 0.68), with differences in anxiety (1.1 points), depression (0.8) and hyperventilation scores (3.2). No differences were seen at 1 month. Airway physiology, inflammation and hyper-responsiveness did not change [16]. The Cochrane review pooled this comparison from the same single trial [15].
- Population
- 183 adults with asthma and impaired health status in UK primary care [16].
- Sources
- [16], [15]
- Caveats
- Three sessions, one trial, single-blind [16].
Cough and phlegm after switching
One trial found cough and phlegm fell more over a year with e-cigarettes than with nicotine replacement, with no difference in wheezing or shortness of breath.
Compared with nicotine replacement therapy [4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- From baseline to 52 weeks, the e-cigarette group had greater declines in cough (RR 0.8, 95% CI 0.6 to 0.9) and phlegm (RR 0.7, 95% CI 0.6 to 0.9) than the nicotine replacement group. Wheezing and shortness of breath did not differ [4].
- Population
- 886 adults at UK stop-smoking services [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- Symptoms were self-reported and participants knew their group. Part of the difference may come from more people quitting cigarettes in the e-cigarette group [4].
VO2 max, Fitbit Charge 2
One study of 60 young adults found the Fitbit Charge 2 fitness score within 1.6 mL/kg/min of laboratory VO2 max on average, with error under 10%.
The numbers and sources
- Device
- Fitbit Charge 2
- Compared with
- Laboratory VO2 max testing
- Effect
- The Fitbit score had a positive bias of 1.59 mL/kg/min against laboratory data averaged over 15 seconds and 0.30 against data averaged over 60 seconds. Tests of equal means and variances did not reject concordance (P = 0.133 and 0.926), and mean absolute percentage error was under 10% for each comparison [5].
- Population
- 65 healthy adults aged 18 to 45 recruited, 60 analyzed, who wore the device for a week and completed a qualifying outdoor run [5].
- Sources
- [5]
- Caveats
- The authors limit the result to young, healthy, fit adults who are able to run. Published in 2019 [5].
VO2 max, Garmin fēnix 6
One study of 19 adults found Garmin fēnix 6 estimates within 7% of laboratory VO2 max on average, meeting the study's preset criteria.
The numbers and sources
- Device
- Garmin fēnix 6
- Compared with
- A metabolic system during a graded exercise test
- Effect
- Against laboratory data averaged over 30 seconds, mean absolute percentage error was 7.05% and concordance correlation 0.73. The study had set validity at an error under 10% and concordance above 0.7 [6].
- Population
- 19 apparently healthy adults, active and sedentary, who completed a graded test and an outdoor run [6].
- Sources
- [6]
- Caveats
- Nineteen participants. No external funding, and the authors declared no conflicts of interest [6].
VO2 max, Garmin Forerunner 265
One study of 20 runners found Garmin Forerunner 265 estimates about 2.7 mL/kg/min above laboratory VO2 max, with error under 10%.
The numbers and sources
- Device
- Garmin Forerunner 265
- Compared with
- A laboratory maximal test
- Effect
- At the start of training the watch estimate averaged 43.95 mL/kg/min against 41.10 in the laboratory (p = 0.009), and after 12 weeks 45.00 against 42.43 (p = .007). Mean absolute percentage error was below the 10% threshold the study had adopted. The watch's half-marathon predictions averaged 129.97 minutes against official times of 137.55 (p = .003) [11].
- Population
- 20 adults in a 12-week half-marathon training program [11].
- Sources
- [11]
- Caveats
- Twenty participants. The overestimate was statistically significant at both time points even though it fell inside the study's threshold [11].
Pneumonia in older adults in nursing homes
Limited evidence: one study of Boston nursing home residents linked serum zinc of 70 µg/dL or above to fewer and shorter pneumonia episodes.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Compared with residents whose serum zinc was below 70 µg/dL, those with final concentrations of 70 µg/dL or above had a lower incidence of pneumonia, almost 50% fewer new antibiotic prescriptions, a shorter duration of pneumonia and fewer days of antibiotic use (2.6 against 3.9 days), with P at or below 0.004 for all. Baseline serum zinc of 70 µg/dL or above was associated with lower all-cause mortality (P = 0.049) [6].
- Population
- Residents of 33 nursing homes in Boston who took part in a 1-year vitamin E trial, 578 with baseline and 420 with final serum zinc. All received daily essential vitamins and minerals, including zinc, at 50% of the US dietary allowance (RDA) [6].
- Sources
- [6]
- Caveats
- An observational analysis within a trial of another nutrient. Infection itself lowers serum zinc [1], so low zinc may mark illness and need not cause it.
Reported risks68
Dry cough
Shown to raise cough, reported by 13.5% on an ACE inhibitor against 8.5% on placebo across 22 trials.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In 22 placebo-controlled trials, cough was reported by 13.5% on an ACE inhibitor and 8.5% on placebo, so about 37% of cough reports on the drug were attributable to it. The attributable share was highest in hypertension trials (85%) and lowest in heart failure trials (29%) [22]. A network meta-analysis of 135 trials found a relative risk of cough of 2.21 against placebo (95% CI 2.05 to 2.39) and 3.2 against ARBs (95% CI 2.91 to 3.51), with similar risk across the 11 ACE inhibitors studied [23]. Across 125 trials, the pooled incidence of cough on enalapril was 11.48% and withdrawal over cough was 2.57% [24].
- Population
- 65,054 people with cardiovascular disease in 22 trials [22]; 45,420 people on 11 ACE inhibitors in 135 trials [23]; 198,130 people in 125 trials [24].
- Sources
- [22], [23], [24]
- Caveats
- Cough was also frequent on placebo, especially in heart failure [22]. Trial rates were several times higher than older label figures [24].
Pneumonia in COPD
Shown to raise serious pneumonia in people with COPD, about 18 more per 1,000 over 18 months on fluticasone, without a change in deaths.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Fluticasone raised non-fatal serious pneumonia (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.50 to 2.12), 18 more per 1,000 over 18 months, whether or not combined with a long-acting beta-agonist. Budesonide also raised it (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.62). Mortality did not differ [17]. Inhaled steroids raised pneumonia in long-term COPD trials (OR 1.56) [9], and combination inhalers did against a long-acting beta-agonist alone (OR 1.55) [10]. In a 3-year label trial, pneumonia was reported in 16% on fluticasone-salmeterol 500/50 and 9% on placebo, and in a 1-year trial in 7% on 250/50 and 3% on salmeterol [15].
- Population
- 43 trials, 26 of fluticasone with 21,247 people and 17 of budesonide with 10,150 [17]; 6,184 people in a 3-year trial and 1,579 in two 1-year trials [15].
- Sources
- [17], [9], [10], [15]
- Caveats
- Pneumonia and COPD flare-ups overlap in their features, which makes diagnosis uncertain [17]. The band above is the 3-year trial rate.
Later cigarette smoking in young people
Linked to three to four times the odds of later starting to smoke in young people who had vaped, in two meta-analyses of longitudinal studies.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In young people who had never smoked, 30.4% of those who had used e-cigarettes started smoking, against 7.9% of those who had not (adjusted OR 3.62, 95% CI 2.42 to 5.41). Past-30-day vaping was linked to past-30-day smoking at follow-up (OR 4.28) [9]. A second review found an OR of 4.59 (95% CI 3.60 to 5.85), with high heterogeneity (I² 88%) [10].
- Population
- 17,389 adolescents and young adults aged 14 to 30 in 9 studies [9]. 17 studies of young people up to 30 [10].
- Sources
- [9], [10]
- Caveats
- Observational. Young people who try e-cigarettes may differ in ways that also lead to smoking. Smoking was self-reported, and no study used negative controls that could test whether the link is causal [10].
Throat irritation, cough and other common side effects
Shown in label trials to raise throat irritation, cough and respiratory infections slightly against a placebo inhaler, with throat irritation in 10% against 7%.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- On albuterol and a placebo inhaler, rates were throat irritation 10% and 7%, viral respiratory infection 7% and 4%, upper respiratory inflammation 5% and 2%, cough 5% and 2%, and musculoskeletal pain 5% and 4%. Fast heart rate, extra heartbeats, palpitations and dizziness were also observed [1].
- Population
- 202 people on albuterol and 201 on placebo, aged 12 and older, in two 12-week trials [1].
- Sources
- [1]
- Caveats
- The placebo group also used albuterol as needed for symptoms [1].
Tiredness and stuffy nose
Shown to raise tiredness and nasal congestion in label trials, with stuffy or runny nose in 13% on tamsulosin 0.4 mg against 8% on placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Rhinitis was 13.1% on tamsulosin 0.4 mg, 17.9% on 0.8 mg and 8.3% on placebo, and asthenia 7.8% against 5.5% [4]. Fatigue was 8.0% on doxazosin against 1.7% on placebo in BPH trials [7]. Asthenia was 7.4% on terazosin against 3.3% [19]. Nasal congestion was 2.1% on silodosin against 0.2% [5].
- Population
- BPH label trials [4][7][19][5].
- Sources
- [4], [7], [19], [5]
- Caveats
- Label adverse reaction tables list events more frequent than placebo, so they are not a full list.
Airway narrowing in asthma and COPD
Shown to lower lung function in asthma, with a fall of 20% or more in about 1 in 8 people after a single selective beta-blocker dose.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In blinded placebo-controlled trials in asthma, a single dose of a selective beta-blocker lowered FEV1 by 6.9% (95% CI 5.2 to 8.5) and caused a fall of 20% or more in 1 in 8 people. Nonselective beta-blockers lowered FEV1 by 10.2% and caused such a fall in 1 in 9 [29]. In COPD, a Cochrane review found cardioselective beta-blockers produced no change in FEV1 or respiratory symptoms against placebo [30]. In a later COPD trial, metoprolol did not change time to first exacerbation (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.32) and was associated with more exacerbations leading to hospitalization (HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.29 to 2.83), with 11 deaths against 5 on placebo [31].
- Population
- People with asthma in randomized trials of single doses [29]; 20 studies in COPD, 11 single-dose and 9 lasting 2 days to 12 weeks [30]; 532 people with COPD at raised risk of exacerbations [31].
- Sources
- [29], [30], [31]
- Caveats
- The asthma figures are for single doses in trials, symptoms did not rise significantly, and the abstract gives no placebo rate for the fall in lung function [29]. The COPD trial enrolled people with no other reason to take a beta-blocker [31].
Upper airway infections and headache
Shown in label trials to raise upper respiratory infections and headache against placebo, with upper respiratory infections in 21% to 27% on fluticasone-salmeterol against 14%.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In 12-week asthma trials, rates on fluticasone-salmeterol 100/50 and 250/50 against placebo were upper respiratory tract infection 27% and 21% against 14%, pharyngitis 13% and 10% against 6%, headache 12% and 13% against 7%, and nausea and vomiting 4% and 6% against 1% [15].
- Population
- 705 adults and adolescents with asthma in two US trials [15].
- Sources
- [15]
- Caveats
- Average exposure was 60 to 79 days on active drugs and 42 days on placebo, so placebo rates may be lower partly from shorter exposure [15].
FDA boxed warning: sedation, dissociation and breathing
FDA states esketamine causes sedation in 48% to 61% and dissociation in 61% to 84% of patients, and respiratory depression after approval, requiring 2 hours of observation.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- The boxed warning covers sedation, dissociation, respiratory depression, abuse and misuse, and suicidal thoughts in young people. In trials, 48% to 61% developed sedation on an observer scale and 0.3% to 0.4% lost consciousness. 61% to 84% developed dissociative or perceptual changes on a clinician scale. Adverse-event reports of dissociation were 41% against 9% on placebo, and sedation 23% against 9%. Respiratory depression and rare respiratory arrest were reported after approval. Patients must be watched by a healthcare provider for at least 2 hours, with pulse oximetry [4].
- Population
- 346 adults on esketamine with an oral antidepressant and 222 on placebo spray, within 1,709 adults in safety studies [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- Rates are for esketamine. Racemic ketamine trials report dissociation as well [6].
Adverse effects with dasatinib plus quercetin
Small trials found more adverse events on dasatinib plus quercetin, 82% against 43% on placebo in one, all self-limiting.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Adverse events occurred in 82% on dasatinib plus quercetin and 43% on placebo. All were self-limiting [2]. In idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, one serious adverse event was reported. The most frequent other events were respiratory symptoms (16 events), skin irritation or bruising (14) and gastrointestinal discomfort (12) [5]. No serious adverse events occurred in the bone trial [13]. Across 6 human studies, reported events were generally mild or manageable [3].
- Population
- 31 adults with MASH [2]; 14 adults with pulmonary fibrosis [5]; 60 postmenopausal women [13]; 6 studies [3].
- Sources
- [2], [5], [13], [3]
- Caveats
- Small samples and short follow-up limit the detection of uncommon or long-term harms [3].
Overdose
Linked to overdose that rises with daily dose, with a 5-year rate of about 1.5% to 4% among new long-term users in a label-cited study.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- The oxycodone label describes a cohort of 220,249 people with new long-term use of Schedule II opioids from 2006 to 2016. The 5-year cumulative incidence of opioid-involved overdose or overdose death ranged from about 1.5% to 4% across study sites, and about 17% of first overdoses were fatal. Higher baseline dose was the strongest predictor [20]. In people prescribed opioids for chronic non-cancer pain, the annual overdose rate was 0.2% at 1 to 20 mg of morphine equivalents a day, 0.7% at 50 to 99 mg (HR 3.7, 95% CI 1.5 to 9.5) and 1.8% at 100 mg or more (HR 8.9, 95% CI 4.0 to 19.7) [17]. Among veterans, fatal overdose occurred in an estimated 0.04% of those treated, and a maximum dose of 100 mg a day or more carried hazard ratios of 7.18 in chronic pain and 6.64 in acute pain against under 20 mg [18].
- Population
- 220,249 new long-term users [20]; 9,940 people given 3 or more opioid prescriptions within 90 days [17]; 750 overdose deaths and a sample of 154,684 veterans treated with opioids [18].
- Sources
- [20], [17], [18]
- Caveats
- Observational. About 80% of the label-cited cohort was lost to follow-up, and its exclusion criteria may have selected people at lower risk [20]. People on higher doses may differ in ways the studies could not measure [17].
Cancer and death after folic acid with B12
Limited evidence: in two Norwegian trials, folic acid with B12 raised cancer from 8.4% to 10.0% and deaths from 13.8% to 16.1% in people with heart disease.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Cancer was diagnosed in 10.0% given folic acid with B12 and 8.4% not given it (HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.41). Death from any cause was 16.1% against 13.8% (HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.33), driven mainly by lung cancer. B6 alone was not linked to any significant effect [8].
- Population
- 6,837 people with ischemic heart disease in two Norwegian trials, median 39 months of treatment and 38 months of follow-up [8].
- Sources
- [8]
- Caveats
- Norway did not fortify food with folic acid. Across 15 trials, mortality did not change [1].
Fenofibrate: blood clots in the lungs and legs
One trial found more pulmonary embolism on fenofibrate than placebo, 1.1% against 0.7%, and more deep vein clots. The label warns of it.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- Pulmonary embolism occurred in 53 of 4,895 on fenofibrate and 32 of 4,900 on placebo (p=0.022), and deep vein thrombosis in 67 against 48 (p=0.074) [7]. A meta-analysis of fenofibrate trials found more venous clots (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.06), an estimate drawn entirely from this trial [13].
- Population
- 9,795 adults with type 2 diabetes [7][13].
- Sources
- [7], [13]
- Caveats
- One trial.
- Why limited
- This rests on one trial, of 9,795 people. Strength counts independent studies that agree, so one trial is limited at any size.
56 more
Cancer with folic acid plus B12
Limited evidence: two Norwegian trials found more cancer with folic acid plus B12 in people with heart disease, while a larger analysis found no significant effect.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In two Norwegian trials, cancer was diagnosed in 10.0% of people given folic acid plus B12 and 8.4% of those not given it (HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.41). Cancer death was 4.0% against 2.9% (HR 1.38) and death from any cause 16.1% against 13.8% (HR 1.18). Lung cancer drove most of the difference. B6 alone showed no effect [14].
- Population
- 6,837 people with ischemic heart disease in Norway, which did not fortify food with folic acid, treated a median 39 months and followed a further 38 months [14].
- Sources
- [14]
- Caveats
- A combined analysis of two trials, with half its follow-up after treatment ended. Sources disagree. A 2013 meta-analysis of individual data from 13 folic acid trials (49,621 people) found no significant effect on overall cancer during treatment (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.13) [16].
Use with opioids
Linked to higher mortality in older adults taking a Z-drug with an opioid, at 11.3 against 8.1 out-of-hospital deaths per 1,000 person-years on low-dose trazodone.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- The zolpidem label states that use with opioids may increase the risk of respiratory depression [13]. Among Medicare beneficiaries taking an opioid at the same time, out-of-hospital deaths occurred at 11.3 per 1,000 person-years on Z-drugs and 8.1 on low-dose trazodone (HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.14 to 3.44), and total mortality was also higher (HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.49). Without an opioid, out-of-hospital mortality on Z-drugs did not differ from trazodone (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.23) [28].
- Population
- 400,924 Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 or older starting a hypnotic, with 3,541 person-years of Z-drug use alongside an opioid [28].
- Sources
- [13], [28]
- Caveats
- Observational, with possible unmeasured confounding. The comparison is against another sleep medicine, not against no treatment, and the rates count deaths from any cause outside hospital.
Pregnancy and newborns
Mixed results: major birth defects were not clearly raised with venlafaxine or duloxetine, while newborn lung pressure problems and bleeding after delivery were linked to exposure.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Uncommon: between 1 in 1,000 and 1 in 100 people.
- Effect
- In 8 cohort studies, first-trimester venlafaxine exposure had a relative risk for major malformations of 1.12 (95% CI 0.92 to 1.35) and duloxetine 0.80 (95% CI 0.46 to 1.29) [40]. In a US cohort, duloxetine had a relative risk of 1.11 (95% CI 0.93 to 1.33) for malformations overall, 1.29 (95% CI 0.99 to 1.68) for cardiovascular malformations, 1.19 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.37) for preterm birth with late exposure and 1.53 (95% CI 1.08 to 2.18) for postpartum hemorrhage [36]. Among pregnancies exposed to an SSRI or SNRI, persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn occurred in 2.9 per 1,000 live births (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.31 to 2.54) [41].
- Population
- 3,186 infants exposed to venlafaxine and 668 to duloxetine [40]; cohorts of 1.3 to 4.1 million pregnancies with about 2,500 to 3,000 early duloxetine exposures [36]; 156,978 exposed pregnancies in 11 studies [41].
- Sources
- [40], [36], [41]
- Caveats
- Observational. The duloxetine data are small, and [41] did not separate SNRIs from SSRIs. The band above is the newborn pulmonary hypertension rate.
Pregnancy and newborns
Linked to persistent pulmonary hypertension in about 2.9 per 1,000 exposed newborns, and to a small rise in birth defects that disappeared among women with a psychiatric diagnosis.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Uncommon: between 1 in 1,000 and 1 in 100 people.
- Effect
- Among 156,978 pregnancies exposed to an SSRI or SNRI, persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn occurred in 2.9 per 1,000 live births (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.31 to 2.54), a number needed to harm of 1,000 [48]. The label gives a background rate of 1 to 2 per 1,000 [24]. Across 29 cohort studies, first-trimester SSRI use was associated with major congenital anomalies (RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.19) and congenital heart defects (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.37). Neither association was significant when the comparison was limited to women with a psychiatric diagnosis (RR 1.04 and 1.06) [49]. The paroxetine label states that first-trimester exposure is associated with a less than 2-fold increase in cardiovascular malformations [28]. The labels also describe newborns exposed late in pregnancy who needed prolonged hospital stays, breathing support and tube feeding, and a less than 2-fold increase in postpartum hemorrhage with use in the month before delivery [24].
- Population
- 11 studies of prenatal exposure [48]; 9,085,954 births in 29 cohort studies [49].
- Sources
- [48], [24], [49], [28]
- Caveats
- Observational, with high heterogeneity for the pulmonary hypertension estimate (I² 72%) [48]. The label also cites a study in which women who stopped antidepressants in pregnancy relapsed more often than women who continued [24].
Serious adverse events, including collapsed lung
Shown in about 1 per 10,000 patients. Two collapsed lungs were recorded among 229,230 patients.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Rare: fewer than 1 in 1,000 people.
- Effect
- Serious adverse events occurred in 1.01 per 10,000 patients (95% CI 0.23 to 2.33) and 7.98 per million treatments [21]. Among 229,230 patients, 2 had a pneumothorax, one treated in hospital, and the longest-lasting side effect was a nerve injury of the leg lasting 180 days [22]. An overview of 17 systematic reviews grouped reported serious events into organ or tissue injuries, with a median of 4 deaths per review, and infections [23].
- Population
- 21 prospective studies [21]. 229,230 patients [22]. 17 systematic reviews of adverse events [23].
- Sources
- [21], [22], [23]
- Caveats
- The overview rated the quality of the reviews as mediocre, and case counts in reviews give no rate [23].
Serious adverse events, including collapsed lung
Prospective surveys recorded major adverse events after about 1 in 1,000 treatments or fewer. Case reports describe collapsed lungs after needling over the chest wall.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Rare: fewer than 1 in 1,000 people.
- Effect
- Twenty major adverse events occurred in 20,494 treatments, about 1 per 1,024 [17]. No significant events occurred in 7,629 treatments, an estimated upper risk of 0.04% or less [18]. Across 59 studies, major events per treatment ranged from 0% to 0.43%, while 0.98% to 39.14% of professionals reported one over their whole practice [19]. In one case, a 24-year-old woman needled between the shoulder blades developed a moderate pneumothorax that needed a chest tube and a night in hospital, and recovered within a month [20].
- Population
- 20,494 treatments [17]. 7,629 treatments [18]. 59 studies including 25 patients in case reports and 2,380 professionals in surveys [19]. One woman [20].
- Sources
- [17], [18], [19], [20]
- Caveats
- Major events in the largest survey included prolonged symptom aggravation and excessive bleeding as well as pneumothorax [17]. Case reports give no rate.
Lung cancer and other cancers
Linked to about nine times the lung cancer risk of never smoking in pooled studies, and to raised risks of cancers of the larynx, throat, mouth and esophagus.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Current smokers had an RR of 8.96 (95% CI 6.73 to 12.11) for lung cancer, 6.98 for laryngeal, 6.76 for pharyngeal, 3.57 for upper digestive tract and 3.43 for oral cancer, against non-smokers [21]. In a second review, never smokers had an RR of lung cancer death of 0.11 (95% CI 0.07 to 0.15) against current smokers [12]. In UK women, the lung cancer death rate ratio for smokers was 21.4 [3].
- Population
- 216 studies of 13 cancer sites, 1961 to 2003 [21]. 24 studies with 969,560 people [12]. 1.2 million UK women [3].
- Sources
- [21], [12], [3]
- Caveats
- The first review pooled case-control and cohort studies, and study type, sex and confounder adjustment changed the estimates [21].
Sleep apnea
Linked to 25% higher risk of sleep apnea at higher alcohol intake, in pooled observational studies.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Higher against lower alcohol consumption was linked to sleep apnea (RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.38, I² 82%) [18].
- Population
- 21 studies of adults [18].
- Sources
- [18]
- Caveats
- Observational, with high heterogeneity and evidence of publication bias [18].
FDA boxed warning: use with opioids
FDA states that taking benzodiazepines with opioids may cause profound sedation, slowed breathing, coma and death. Studies linked the combination to about twice the overdose risk.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The boxed warning states that concomitant use of benzodiazepines and opioids may result in profound sedation, respiratory depression, coma and death [18]. Among privately insured opioid users, also using a benzodiazepine was associated with an emergency visit or admission for opioid overdose (adjusted OR 2.14, 95% CI 2.05 to 2.24) [20]. Among veterans receiving opioids, a current benzodiazepine prescription was associated with death from drug overdose (HR 3.86, 95% CI 3.49 to 4.26), rising with benzodiazepine dose [21]. FDA reported that 55% of overdose deaths involving benzodiazepines from 2013 to 2017 also involved prescription opioids [22].
- Population
- US privately insured opioid users from 2001 to 2013 [20]; US veterans receiving opioid analgesics, 112,069 of them also prescribed benzodiazepines [21]; US death records summarized by FDA [22].
- Sources
- [18], [20], [21], [22]
- Caveats
- Observational studies. The sources give relative risks and counts, not the rate among people taking both.
Pneumonia
Mixed results: one meta-analysis linked H2 blockers to about 22% higher odds of pneumonia, while intensive care analyses found no clear rise against no prophylaxis.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In observational studies, H2 blocker use was associated with pneumonia (adjusted OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.36), and in randomized trials with hospital-acquired pneumonia (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.48) [17]. In intensive care, the odds of pneumonia against no prophylaxis were 1.26 (95% CI 0.89 to 1.85), low certainty [6], and the risk ratio in the update was 1.07 (95% CI 0.85 to 1.37) [7].
- Population
- 8 observational studies and 23 randomized trials [17]; 72 and 74 trials in critically ill patients [6][7].
- Sources
- [17], [6], [7]
- Caveats
- The populations differ. The intensive care estimates had wide intervals [6][7].
Blood clots
Shown to roughly double pulmonary embolism on estrogen plus progestin. In health records, oral therapy was linked to more clots and transdermal therapy was not.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In the WHI trial, pulmonary embolism HR was 2.13 (95% CI 1.39 to 3.25), 8 more per 10,000 person-years [4]. In UK health records, oral therapy was associated with more venous thromboembolism (adjusted OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.52 to 1.64), highest for conjugated equine estrogen with medroxyprogesterone (2.10, 95% CI 1.92 to 2.31). Transdermal therapy was not associated with higher risk (0.93, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.01) [17].
- Population
- 16,608 women in the WHI trial [4]; 80,396 women aged 40 to 79 with a clot and 391,494 matched controls [17].
- Sources
- [4], [17]
- Caveats
- The route comparison comes from case-control data, not a randomized trial.
Beta carotene and lung cancer in smokers
Shown to raise lung cancer in current smokers at high beta carotene doses of 20 to 30 mg a day, well above typical multivitamin content.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Beta carotene, with or without vitamin A, was associated with more lung cancer (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.42, 4 RCTs, 94,830 people) and cardiovascular death (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.19) [4]. Among current smokers, beta carotene raised lung cancer risk (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.39) and among former smokers did not (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.45). 70% of 47 sampled multivitamins contained beta carotene [15].
- Population
- People at high risk of lung cancer in large prevention trials [4][15].
- Sources
- [4], [15]
- Caveats
- The trial doses (20 to 30 mg a day) are well above the median multivitamin content of 0.3 mg [15].
With benzodiazepines, gabapentin and other sedating drugs
Linked to about twice the odds of an overdose visit when opioids were taken with benzodiazepines, and to more opioid-related deaths with gabapentin.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Among opioid users, concurrent benzodiazepine use was associated with an emergency room visit or admission for opioid overdose (adjusted OR 2.14, 95% CI 2.05 to 2.24) [29]. Among opioid users in Ontario, gabapentin in the prior 120 days was associated with opioid-related death (adjusted OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.88). Concurrent NSAID use was not (adjusted OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.32) [30]. Concurrent skeletal muscle relaxants were associated with opioid overdose (combined HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.48), more with baclofen (1.83, 95% CI 1.11 to 3.04) [31]. The boxed warning states that use with benzodiazepines or other central nervous system depressants, including alcohol, may result in profound sedation, respiratory depression, coma and death [20].
- Population
- 315,428 privately insured US adults who filled an opioid prescription [29]; 1,256 opioid-related deaths and 4,619 matched controls [30]; incident and prevalent opioid user cohorts [31].
- Sources
- [29], [30], [31], [20]
- Caveats
- Observational. None of the studies gives the share of people on a combination who overdosed.
Breathing ozone, the FDA position
FDA states ozone is a toxic gas with no known useful medical application, and that breathing it irritates the airways and can cause delayed fluid in the lungs.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The FDA's device rule states ozone's main effect is irritation of the mucous membranes, that lung irritation can cause pulmonary edema delayed by hours, and that smell is an unreliable warning because the nose quickly stops detecting it. It caps ozone from devices at 0.05 parts per million in occupied spaces [1].
- Population
- A federal regulation [1].
- Sources
- [1]
- Caveats
- The rule addresses ozone in air and ozone devices. It does not report rates of harm from ozone injected in medical procedures.
Childhood asthma
Mixed results: one meta-analysis linked cats and dogs to slightly more childhood asthma, another of 77,434 children found no link, and a review found less allergy.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Cat ownership (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.33) and dog ownership (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.24) were linked to childhood asthma [14]. In nine European birth cohorts, early-life cat (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.09) and dog ownership (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.01) were not linked to school-age asthma, but children already sensitized to cats or dogs had much more asthma, and ownership may add to that risk [13]. In 9 urban cohorts, 6 found less allergic disease with perinatal dog or cat exposure, and 2 found more risk only in high-risk groups [15].
- Population
- 1,871,295 children in 60 studies, 42 of them case-control [14]. 77,434 mother and child pairs in 9 birth cohorts, children aged 5 to 11 [13]. 6,498 participants in 9 cohorts [15].
- Sources
- [14], [13], [15]
- Caveats
- Observational. Families with allergic parents often avoid pets, which confounds the link, and case-control studies can be biased by recall [15].
Pneumonia
Mixed results: observational studies linked proton pump inhibitors to about 27% higher odds of pneumonia, while a 3-year randomized trial found no difference from placebo.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Across eight observational studies, pneumonia was more common in proton pump inhibitor users (adjusted OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.46), with very high heterogeneity (I² 90.5%) [21]. In a placebo-controlled trial of pantoprazole for a median of 3 years, pneumonia did not differ between groups [19].
- Population
- 5 case-control and 3 cohort studies [21]; 17,598 adults with stable cardiovascular disease [19].
- Sources
- [21], [19]
- Caveats
- Observational studies cannot rule out that sicker people are prescribed acid reducers [21]. The trial abstract does not give pneumonia counts [19].
COPD, chronic bronchitis and emphysema
Linked to about three and a half times the COPD risk of never smoking in one meta-analysis, rising with amount smoked and pack-years.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Against never smokers, current smoking had an RR of 3.51 (95% CI 3.08 to 3.99) for COPD, 3.41 for chronic bronchitis and 4.87 (95% CI 2.83 to 8.41) for emphysema. Risk rose with amount smoked and pack-years [17].
- Population
- 218 studies, 133 with COPD data, published to 2006 [17].
- Sources
- [17]
- Caveats
- Estimates were markedly heterogeneous and lower when based on lung function or when asthma was counted as COPD [17].
Asthma and COPD
Linked to more asthma and COPD in people who vape, after accounting for cigarette smoking, in one meta-analysis of population studies.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- E-cigarette use was linked to asthma (adjusted OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.28 to 1.51, 15 studies) and COPD (adjusted OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.36 to 1.65, 9 studies), controlling for cigarette smoking and other factors [8].
- Population
- General-population samples in 15 asthma studies and 9 COPD studies, cross-sectional and longitudinal [8].
- Sources
- [8]
- Caveats
- Observational, with many cross-sectional studies, so the order of events is unclear. People with lung disease may switch from cigarettes to e-cigarettes, which is reverse causation, and past smoking is hard to account for fully.
Lung cancer in smokers
Shown to raise lung cancer 16% to 28% with beta-carotene in smokers and asbestos-exposed workers.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In ATBC, lung cancer was 18% higher on beta-carotene (95% CI 3% to 36%) [8]. In CARET, it was 28% higher (RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.57), and death from lung cancer 46% higher (RR 1.46, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.00) [5]. Across 8 trials, beta-carotene raised lung cancer (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.26), and more so in smokers and asbestos workers (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.35) [10]. In AREDS2, 23 people on beta-carotene and 11 without it developed lung cancer, mostly former smokers [7].
- Population
- 29,133 Finnish male smokers aged 50 to 69, 5 to 8 years [8]; 18,314 smokers, former smokers and asbestos-exposed workers, mean 4 years [5]; 167,141 participants in 8 trials [10]; 4,203 AREDS2 participants [7].
- Sources
- [5], [7], [8], [10]
- Caveats
- CARET was stopped 21 months early [5]. The meta-analysis found no dose relationship [10]. The AREDS2 finding was a nominal P of .04 [7].
Lung cancer
Linked to slightly more lung cancer than ARBs in observational studies, 1.6 against 1.2 cases per 1,000 person-years. Pooled trials found no rise in cancer overall.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In a UK cohort, ACE inhibitor use was associated with more lung cancer than ARB use (1.6 against 1.2 per 1,000 person-years, HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.29), rising to HR 1.31 after more than 10 years of use [32]. A meta-analysis of 7 cohort and 4 case-control studies found a pooled OR of 1.19 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.36) with very high heterogeneity (I² 98%) [33]. In a network meta-analysis of 70 randomized trials, cancer of any type occurred in 2.03% on ACE inhibitors and 2.02% on placebo (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.09) [34].
- Population
- 992,061 people newly treated with blood pressure drugs, mean follow-up 6.4 years [32]; 11 observational studies [33]; 324,168 participants in 70 randomized trials [34].
- Sources
- [32], [33], [34]
- Caveats
- The lung cancer findings are observational. The randomized trials counted all cancers together and ran at least 1 year, shorter than the 5 years after which the cohort association appeared [32][34].
Heavy use, asthma attacks and death
Linked to more exacerbations and deaths with more canisters a year: 11 or more canisters carried 2.35 times the risk of death of 2 or fewer.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Against 2 or fewer canisters a year, exacerbation risk was higher with 3 to 5 (HR 1.26), 6 to 10 (HR 1.44) and 11 or more (HR 1.77). Death risk was higher with 3 to 5 (HR 1.26), 6 to 10 (HR 1.67) and 11 or more (HR 2.35, 95% CI 2.02 to 2.72). 30% of patients collected 3 or more canisters a year [13]. The label states deaths have been reported with excessive use of inhaled sympathomimetics, with cardiac arrest after a severe asthma attack suspected [1].
- Population
- 365,324 people with asthma in Sweden followed an average of 85 months [13].
- Sources
- [13], [1]
- Caveats
- Observational. Heavy use may mark poorly controlled asthma rather than cause harm.
Airways narrowing after a dose (paradoxical bronchospasm)
The label warns albuterol can cause paradoxical bronchospasm, which may be life threatening and often occurs with the first use of a new canister. It gives no rate.
Interactions with beta-blockers, diuretics, digoxin and some antidepressants
The label warns that beta-blockers block albuterol and may cause severe bronchospasm, diuretics may worsen low potassium, and MAOIs or tricyclics may strengthen its effects on blood vessels.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label states beta-blockers block albuterol's effect in the lungs and may produce severe bronchospasm in asthma. Loop or thiazide diuretics' ECG changes and low potassium can be acutely worsened. Single doses of albuterol lowered serum digoxin by 16% to 22% in volunteers. The vascular effects of albuterol may be potentiated during or within 2 weeks of MAOIs or tricyclic antidepressants [1].
- Population
- Labeling statements and a volunteer study [1].
- Sources
- [1]
- Caveats
- The label gives no rate of harm.
Interaction with opioids and sedatives
One small trial found alcohol deepened oxycodone's slowing of breathing by a further 19%. Alcohol was involved in about a fifth of US opioid and benzodiazepine deaths.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Oxycodone 20 mg cut resting breathing by 28%, and an alcohol infusion reaching 1 g/L cut it by a further 19%, with more pauses in breathing. Older volunteers were more affected [19]. In US data from 2010, alcohol was involved in 22.1% of opioid pain reliever deaths and 21.4% of benzodiazepine deaths [20]. Alcohol was involved in 14.7% of all opioid overdose deaths in 2017 [21]. A review lists opioids, benzodiazepines, barbiturates and sleep medicines among drugs whose effects on the brain alcohol enhances [22].
- Population
- 12 young and 12 older opioid-naive volunteers [19]. US emergency visits and deaths in 13 states [20]. 399,230 US opioid deaths from 1999 to 2017 [21].
- Sources
- [19], [20], [21], [22]
- Caveats
- Death records show alcohol was involved, not that it caused the death.
Aspirin-sensitive asthma and allergic reactions
The label warns that aspirin may cause severe hives, swelling or bronchospasm in people with the syndrome of asthma, rhinitis and nasal polyps.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The prescription aspirin label lists hypersensitivity to NSAIDs and the syndrome of asthma, rhinitis and nasal polyps as contraindications, stating that aspirin may cause severe urticaria, angioedema or bronchospasm [23].
- Population
- A contraindication in labeling, with no study counts [23].
- Sources
- [23]
- Caveats
- The label gives no rate.
Breathing in people with lung disease
The alprazolam label reports deaths in people with severe lung disease shortly after starting treatment. It gives no rate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label states there have been reports of death in patients with severe pulmonary disease shortly after the initiation of alprazolam, and describes respiratory depression, hypoventilation and apnea as signs to watch for in people with impaired respiratory function [18].
- Population
- Reports summarized in labeling [18].
- Sources
- [18]
- Caveats
- No denominator.
Reported adverse events
Case reports: FDA held three reports for injected BPC-157, including injection site swelling, shortness of breath and skin darkening. FDA states it is unclear whether BPC-157 caused them.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- FDA's adverse event database held three reports through December 4, 2025, all for injected BPC-157. One described 9 days of redness and swelling at the injection site in a person also injecting thymosin. One described shortness of breath leading to an emergency room visit. One described diffuse darkening of the skin and gums that recurred on re-exposure, with a product containing both BPC-157 and TB-500 that was labeled for research purposes only. FDA's food and supplement complaint system held three more cases, complicated by multi-ingredient supplements and missing details. FDA found no case reports in the published literature [3].
- Population
- Voluntary reports to FDA [3].
- Sources
- [3]
- Caveats
- FDA states it is unclear whether these events were caused by BPC-157, and that reporting is voluntary and incomplete [3].
Allergy
Case reports: four laboratory workers developed allergy to bromelain, mostly from breathing it in. No count exists for people taking it by mouth.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Four workers in a blood grouping laboratory developed occupational allergy to bromelain, with mostly respiratory symptoms. Sensitization was more common among exposed workers than unexposed people and usually came from breathing it in, not swallowing it. The authors report that skin testing with bromelain can trigger systemic reactions, even at very high dilutions [10].
- Population
- Laboratory workers and unexposed controls [10].
- Sources
- [10]
- Caveats
- Workplace inhalation, not supplement use. No count of allergy among people taking bromelain by mouth was located.
Inhaling stomach contents under anesthesia
The label reports rare cases of pulmonary aspiration during anesthesia or deep sedation in people on GLP-1 drugs, with food still in the stomach despite fasting.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Dulaglutide delays gastric emptying. Rare postmarketing reports describe pulmonary aspiration during elective procedures under general anesthesia or deep sedation in people on GLP-1 receptor agonists who had retained stomach contents despite following fasting instructions [1].
- Population
- Postmarketing reports [1].
- Sources
- [1]
- Caveats
- The label states the data are insufficient to say whether changing fasting or pausing the drug would reduce the risk [1].
Worse flu course without oseltamivir
One trial found that, in a post hoc subgroup, flu symptoms were 2 days worse on elderberry alone than on placebo alone.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In a post hoc analysis of the 2020 trial, symptom outcomes for elderberry taken alone, without oseltamivir, were 2 days worse than for placebo taken alone [5].
- Population
- Subgroup of 87 emergency room flu patients [5].
- Sources
- [5]
- Caveats
- Post hoc subgroup of a small trial.
Allergy
Case reports: two people had severe immediate allergy to fenugreek with wheezing, and both also reacted to chickpea.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Two patients had severe immediate allergy to fenugreek, one with wheezing and fainting after inhaling the powder and one with facial angioedema and wheezing after scalp application. Both had a peak flow drop of more than 20% on double-blind challenge with fenugreek and with chickpea [12].
- Population
- Two cases from a food allergy survey [12].
- Sources
- [12]
- Caveats
- Case reports. Cross-reaction with chickpea was seen in both [12].
FDA warning: serious breathing problems
FDA states serious breathing difficulties may occur in people taking gabapentin or pregabalin who also use opioids or other sedating drugs, or have reduced lung function.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In 2019 FDA warned that serious breathing difficulties may occur in people using gabapentinoids who have respiratory risk factors: use of opioids or other drugs that depress the central nervous system, conditions such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and older age. FDA required new label warnings and required manufacturers to run trials of abuse potential, particularly in combination with opioids [20]. Both labels now state that case reports, human studies and animal studies associate the drug with serious, life-threatening or fatal respiratory depression when taken with central nervous system depressants, including opioids, or with underlying respiratory impairment [19][7].
- Population
- Case reports and studies reviewed by FDA [20].
- Sources
- [20], [19], [7]
- Caveats
- The warning rests largely on case reports, with no rate. This is not a boxed warning.
Use with opioids
Linked to about 49% higher odds of opioid-related death when gabapentin was prescribed alongside an opioid, in one case-control study of opioid users.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Among people prescribed opioids in Ontario, 12.3% of those who died of an opioid-related cause (155 of 1,256) and 6.8% of matched controls (313 of 4,619) had been prescribed gabapentin in the previous 120 days. After adjustment, the combination was associated with higher odds of opioid-related death than an opioid alone (adjusted OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.88), rising to about 1.6 at moderate and high gabapentin doses [21]. The gabapentin label reports respiratory depression and sedation, sometimes resulting in death, with opioids such as morphine, hydrocodone, oxycodone and buprenorphine. It states that morphine raises gabapentin levels and that gabapentin lowers hydrocodone exposure [19].
- Population
- 1,256 cases and 4,619 controls among opioid users, 1997 to 2013 [21].
- Sources
- [21], [19]
- Caveats
- Observational. The study gives odds among people already taking opioids, not an absolute rate. The evidence is for gabapentin.
Legionnaires' disease from potting mix and compost
Case-control studies and case reports: Legionella longbeachae pneumonia was linked to handling potting mix or compost, poor hand washing after gardening, and long-term smoking.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In New Zealand, risk factors were COPD, smoking over 10 years and exposure to compost or potting mix, including tipping and troweling it and having unwashed hands near the face. Mask or glove use was not protective [12]. In South Australia, recent use of potting mix was linked to illness in bivariate analysis (OR 4.74, 95% CI 1.65 to 13.55), and poor hand washing after gardening, long-term smoking and being near dripping hanging pots were stronger predictors [13]. A review found 79 cases outside Australia and New Zealand over 20 years, including severe pneumonia [14].
- Population
- 31 hospitalized cases and 172 controls [12]. 25 cases and 75 matched controls [13]. Case reports from Europe, Asia and North America [14].
- Sources
- [12], [13], [14]
- Caveats
- Small case-control studies with no rate among gardeners. The infection is endemic in Australia and New Zealand and reported less often elsewhere [14].
Choking on konjac jelly candies
FDA states it warned in 2001 about choking on konjac candy after several deaths. Its import alert covers firm mini-cup jelly candies.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- FDA states that in 2001 it warned about the danger of choking caused by konjac candy following several choking deaths, and near-deaths among children and elderly people. Its import alert covers mini-cup gel and jelly candies of firm consistency, including those made with other gelling agents such as carrageenan [12].
- Population
- US import regulation [12].
- Sources
- [12]
- Caveats
- These are candies, not supplement capsules or powders. FDA ties the risk to the candies' shape and firmness [12].
Long-term use
Mixed results for NAC, one half of GlyNAC: long-term use was linked to lower cancer risk in people with COPD, while in mice with lung tumors it sped tumor growth.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- In a Taiwanese cohort of 91,546 matched people with COPD, long-term NAC use was linked to lower cancer risk than non-use (adjusted HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.72) [8]. In mouse models of lung cancer, NAC in the diet markedly increased tumor progression and shortened survival, by lowering reactive oxygen species, DNA damage and p53 in tumor cells [9]. No study of glycine and NAC together beyond 24 weeks was located.
- Population
- Adults with COPD in Taiwan's national insurance database [8]. Mice with B-RAF or K-RAS driven lung cancer [9].
- Sources
- [8], [9]
- Caveats
- The cohort is observational, so people who took NAC may differ in ways the matching missed [8]. The mouse finding applies to existing tumors and has not been tested in people [9]. Neither study tested glycine.
Less airflow with the mouth closed in some people with sleep apnea
One study of 54 people with sleep apnea found closing the mouth reduced airflow in heavy mouth breathers and in those with a blockage behind the soft palate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- During drug-induced sleep endoscopy, holding the mouth closed raised total inspiratory airflow overall by 1.0 L/min, raised it by 2.0 L/min in 32 moderate mouth breathers, and lowered it by 1.9 L/min (95% CI -3.1 to -0.6) in those with high mouth breathing. Velopharyngeal obstruction was linked to reduced airflow with mouth closure (-1.9 L/min) [9].
- Population
- 54 adults with obstructive sleep apnea, 72% men, median apnea-hypopnea index 26.9 [9].
- Sources
- [9]
- Caveats
- The mouth was held shut by pressure on the chin during sedated endoscopy, not taped during natural sleep. The authors conclude mouth breathing can be an essential route around a nasal blockage for some people [9].
With opioids
Linked to slightly more opioid overdose when a muscle relaxant was taken with an opioid, more so with baclofen and beyond 60 days of use.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Against opioid use alone, concurrent use of a skeletal muscle relaxant was associated with opioid overdose (combined HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.48). The hazard ratio was 0.91 for 14 days or less and 1.80 (95% CI 1.30 to 2.48) beyond 60 days. It was 1.83 for baclofen (95% CI 1.11 to 3.04), 1.84 for carisoprodol, and 1.39 when a benzodiazepine was also used [18].
- Population
- Incident and prevalent opioid user cohorts in a population-based study [18].
- Sources
- [18]
- Caveats
- Observational, and the main estimate's interval reaches 1.00.
Allergic reactions
The label reports anaphylaxis and bronchospasm, including in people allergic to other drugs of the same class. It gives no rate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Hypersensitivity reactions, including anaphylaxis and bronchospasm, have been reported, including in people who had reacted to other 5-HT3 antagonists [3].
- Population
- Reports summarized in the label [3].
- Sources
- [3]
- Caveats
- Reports, with no denominator.
Boxed warning: addiction, overdose and breathing depression
FDA states these drugs expose users to addiction, abuse and misuse that can lead to overdose and death, and can cause fatal breathing depression.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The boxed warning on oxycodone tablets states that the drug exposes patients and other users to the risks of opioid addiction, abuse and misuse, which can lead to overdose and death. It states that serious, life-threatening or fatal respiratory depression may occur, especially when starting or after a dose increase, and that accidental ingestion of even one dose, especially by children, can result in a fatal overdose. It also covers use with benzodiazepines or other central nervous system depressants, neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome and interactions with CYP3A4 inhibitors [20]. The hydrocodone and acetaminophen label carries the same warnings and adds liver toxicity from acetaminophen [19]. The tramadol label adds that life-threatening respiratory depression and death have occurred in children given tramadol, and lists children under 12 as a contraindication [16].
- Population
- People taking oxycodone, hydrocodone or tramadol, as described in the labels [20][19][16].
- Sources
- [20], [19], [16]
- Caveats
- A boxed warning states a risk and gives no rate. Rates from studies are in the blocks below.
With drugs that change how the liver clears opioids
The label warns that CYP3A4 inhibitors, including some antibiotics and antifungals, can raise oxycodone and hydrocodone levels and cause fatal breathing depression.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The boxed warnings state that CYP3A4 inhibitors may raise oxycodone or hydrocodone concentrations and cause potentially fatal respiratory depression, and that stopping a CYP3A4 inducer may do the same. The oxycodone label names macrolide antibiotics such as erythromycin, azole antifungals such as ketoconazole and protease inhibitors such as ritonavir as inhibitors, and rifampin, carbamazepine and phenytoin as inducers [20][19]. The tramadol label also names the CYP2D6 inhibitors quinidine, fluoxetine, paroxetine and bupropion as changing tramadol and its active metabolite [16].
- Population
- People taking these drugs together, as described in the labels [20][19][16].
- Sources
- [20], [19], [16]
- Caveats
- The labels give no rate.
Abuse potential, tolerance, and heart and lung warnings
The label classifies phentermine as a Schedule IV controlled substance and states tolerance to the appetite effect usually develops within a few weeks.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The phentermine label classifies it as a Schedule IV controlled substance related to the amphetamines. It states that tolerance to the appetite effect usually develops within a few weeks. It lists rare reported cases of primary pulmonary hypertension and of serious regurgitant heart valve disease. The valve cases were reported with phentermine combined with fenfluramine or dexfenfluramine, and the label states the role of phentermine itself has not been established [10].
- Population
- Postmarketing reports and pharmacology summarized in the label [10].
- Sources
- [10]
- Caveats
- These are label statements and case reports, not trial rates.
Blackout and drowning after hyperventilating before breath-holding in water
Case series: New York State recorded 16 fatal and nonfatal drownings in otherwise healthy swimmers that followed intentional hyperventilation, hypoxic training or prolonged breath-holding.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- A state health department review of 1988 to 2011 identified 16 drownings that followed dangerous underwater breath-holding behaviors in swimmers with no known medical condition or substance use. Practicing more than one of these behaviors was linked to a higher risk of death. The review was prompted by two healthy young men who became unconscious underwater and died after intentional hyperventilation before submersion [20].
- Population
- 16 swimmers in New York State, 15 of them at pools [20].
- Sources
- [20]
- Caveats
- A case series with no denominator. These were swimmers breath-holding underwater, not people doing breathwork on land.
Low blood oxygen and alkalosis during cyclic hyperventilation
One small trial measured intermittent respiratory alkalosis and low blood oxygen while trained volunteers practiced cyclic hyperventilation with breath retention.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Practicing the learned techniques produced intermittent respiratory alkalosis and hypoxia and a sharp rise in plasma adrenaline [17]. A review of high ventilation breathwork describes marked changes in conscious experience and in central and autonomic nervous system function, and discusses its safety profile [21].
- Population
- 12 trained healthy volunteers [17]. Studies of high ventilation breathwork [21].
- Sources
- [17], [21]
- Caveats
- The trial measured the change and did not report symptoms from it [17]. The review abstract gives no rates [21].
Acute kidney injury and pulmonary embolism
One trial found more acute kidney injury and blood clots in the lungs on testosterone in men at high heart risk. Event counts were not given.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- TRAVERSE reported a higher incidence of acute kidney injury and pulmonary embolism in the testosterone group than the placebo group [8].
- Population
- 5,246 men aged 45 to 80 at high cardiovascular risk [8].
- Sources
- [8]
- Caveats
- One trial. The abstract reports these as observed differences without event counts.
- Why limited
- This rests on one trial, of 5,246 people. Strength counts independent studies that agree, so one trial is limited at any size.
Vaping-associated lung injury (EVALI)
Case series: a US outbreak of lung injury in 2019 and 2020 hospitalized 2,668 people, mostly users of THC vaping products, with vitamin E acetate found in most cases tested.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- By January 14, 2020, 2,668 hospitalized cases had been reported, median age 24 and 66% male. 82% reported using THC-containing products and 14% only nicotine-containing products [11]. Vitamin E acetate was found in lung fluid from 48 of 51 patients (94%) and in none of 99 healthy comparators [12].
- Population
- US patients hospitalized with EVALI, August 2019 to January 2020 [11]. 51 patients in 16 states and 99 comparators [12].
- Sources
- [11], [12]
- Caveats
- Case counts with no denominator of users. CDC stated that other chemicals in THC or non-THC products could not be ruled out in some cases [11].
Lung cancer
Limited evidence: a review of five observational studies suggested a possible link with lung cancer, mainly in people who also smoked, and could not establish cause.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Five observational studies, published 2019 to 2024, suggested a potential association between e-cigarette use and lung cancer, with the highest likelihood in people who used both cigarettes and e-cigarettes [13].
- Population
- 5 studies with 3,162 to 4,329,288 participants [13].
- Sources
- [13]
- Caveats
- Heterogeneous studies with little long-term data. Most users had also smoked, and cancer takes decades to develop [13].
Lung cancer in men using high-dose B12 supplements
Linked to about twice the lung cancer rate in men taking over 55 µg a day of B12 supplements for 10 years, stronger in smokers. No link in women.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Men whose 10-year average B12 supplement dose was above 55 µg a day had a higher lung cancer rate than nonusers (HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.32 to 2.97). The association was stronger in men who smoked. No association appeared in women, or for B12 from multivitamins [17].
- Population
- 77,118 adults aged 50 to 76 in Washington State, 808 lung cancers [17].
- Sources
- [17]
- Caveats
- Observational cohort with self-reported supplement use. It shows an association, not a cause.
Lung cancer in men
Linked to about 82% more lung cancer in men taking over 20 mg a day of B6 from single supplements for 10 years, higher in smokers. No link in women.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Men averaging more than 20 mg a day of B6 from single supplements over 10 years had more lung cancer than nonusers (HR 1.82, 95% CI 1.25 to 2.65). Risk was higher in men who smoked at baseline. Women showed no association, and B6 from multivitamins showed none [17].
- Population
- 77,118 adults aged 50 to 76, 808 lung cancers [17].
- Sources
- [17]
- Caveats
- One observational cohort with self-reported supplement use.
Breathing during sleep
The label reports lower oxygen levels during sleep on zolpidem than placebo in people with mild to moderate sleep apnea. It gives no rate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label states that 10 mg of zolpidem did not depress breathing in healthy subjects or in people with mild to moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In people with mild to moderate sleep apnea, the lowest oxygen saturation fell and time spent below 80% and 90% saturation rose against placebo. Postmarketing reports describe respiratory insufficiency, mostly in people with existing breathing impairment. Neonates exposed late in pregnancy have had respiratory depression [13].
- Population
- Studies in healthy subjects, people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and people with sleep apnea, summarized in labeling without counts [13].
- Sources
- [13]
- Caveats
- No numbers are given for the size of the oxygen changes.
Severe allergic reactions
The label warns of angioedema of the tongue, glottis or larynx after first or later doses of sedative hypnotics including zolpidem. It gives no rate.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label reports cases of angioedema involving the tongue, glottis or larynx, some with shortness of breath, throat closing or nausea and vomiting suggesting anaphylaxis, and some needing emergency treatment. It states that airway obstruction may be fatal [13].
- Population
- Case reports summarized in labeling [13].
- Sources
- [13]
- Caveats
- Reports with no denominator. The trial database lists anaphylactic shock as rare, fewer than 1 in 1,000 [13].
Pregnancy
The label reports breathing problems and sedation in newborns exposed late in pregnancy. One registry study linked zolpidem in pregnancy to low birth weight and preterm delivery.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- The label states that neonates born to mothers using zolpidem late in the third trimester have had respiratory depression and sedation, in some reports needing ventilation, and that published observational studies, registries and case reports do not show a clear association with major birth defects [13]. In a Taiwan registry study, mothers who received zolpidem in pregnancy had higher odds of low birth weight (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.64), preterm delivery (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.28 to 1.74), small-for-gestational-age infants (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.49) and cesarean delivery (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.59 to 1.90) [32].
- Population
- 2,497 mothers who received zolpidem during pregnancy and 12,485 who did not [32]; published reports summarized in labeling [13].
- Sources
- [13], [32]
- Caveats
- Observational, and insomnia or the conditions behind it may account for part of the association. The label gives no rate for neonatal effects.
FDA warnings on unproven uses
FDA states hyperbaric devices are not proven to cure cancer, Lyme disease, autism or Alzheimer's disease, and that explosions and fires have occurred in unreviewed chambers at unaccredited facilities.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- FDA's consumer update lists the risks as ear and sinus pain, middle ear injuries including eardrum rupture, temporary vision changes, and rarely lung collapse. It says high oxygen concentrations pose a risk of fire, that explosions and fires have occurred in chambers not reviewed by FDA at unaccredited facilities, and that people have used zippered altitude-sickness bags to build homemade devices that pose risks of fire and suffocation. It names the Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society as the accrediting body [1].
- Population
- US consumers [1].
- Sources
- [1]
- Caveats
- The update carries a content date of July 26, 2021, and is cited from an archived copy because the page was no longer on FDA's site when checked in November 2026. FDA also states that serious complications are rare when chambers are used for cleared conditions.
FDA consumer warning
FDA states it has not cleared or approved any whole-body cryotherapy device for medical treatment, and names asphyxiation, frostbite, burns and eye injury as hazards.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a consumer update dated July 5, 2016, FDA said it does not have evidence that whole-body cryotherapy treats conditions such as Alzheimer's, fibromyalgia, migraines, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, stress, anxiety or chronic pain. It listed potential hazards including asphyxiation, especially when liquid nitrogen is used for cooling, because nitrogen vapor in a closed room lowers oxygen and can cause loss of consciousness, along with frostbite, burns and eye injury. It also voiced concern about people choosing cryotherapy in place of established treatment [1].
- Population
- US consumers [1].
- Sources
- [1], [25]
- Caveats
- The update dates from 2016 and is cited here from an archived copy, since the page was no longer on FDA's site when checked in November 2026. A later safety review argues that some reports behind regulator concerns involved partial-body nitrogen cabins, not whole-body chambers [25].
Cold shock and irregular heartbeats
One small study recorded ectopic heartbeats in 11 of 12 healthy volunteers during breath-hold submersion in water at 5°C to 10°C.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 12 volunteers submerged in water at 5°C and 10°C while holding their breath, ectopic arrhythmias occurred in 11 subjects and 29 of 36 submersions, mostly in the 10 seconds after breath holding ended. They included supraventricular tachycardia and premature ventricular beats [28]. A review proposes that simultaneous cold shock and diving responses, which it calls autonomic conflict, may account for these arrhythmias and for some deaths ascribed to drowning or hypothermia [29]. An earlier review concluded the cold shock response can incapacitate or kill long before hypothermia develops [30]. A meta-analysis found the response habituates with repeated immersions, with heart rate 14 beats a minute lower and minute ventilation 21.3 L a minute lower [31].
- Population
- 12 volunteers wearing wet or dry suits [28]. Up to 145 participants in 17 groups in habituation studies [31].
- Sources
- [28], [29], [30], [31]
- Caveats
- The arrhythmia study involved face-under submersion with breath holding, not a head-out plunge. The link from these arrhythmias to deaths is a hypothesis in the review, not a measured rate [29].
Fluid in the lungs during cold water swimming
Case series: 292 published cases of immersion pulmonary edema in swimmers and divers. Of 58 triathlon deaths reviewed, 42 happened during the swim.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A case series of 36 people who had immersion pulmonary edema found 72.2% had a medical condition such as hypertension, heart rhythm or structural problems, asthma or diabetes. Its literature review counted 292 cases, 24.0% with identifiable cardiopulmonary risk factors [35]. Of 58 deaths in triathlon training or events in the US and Canada from 2008 to 2015, 42 (72.4%) occurred during the swim. Heart mass exceeded the 95th percentile in 9 of 20 autopsies reporting it, a marker the authors tie to susceptibility [36].
- Population
- 36 swimmers and divers, mean age 50 [35]. 58 deaths, 23 with postmortem reports [36].
- Sources
- [35], [36]
- Caveats
- Case series give no rate per swimmer. These cases involve exertion while swimming or diving, not sitting in a tub. The triathlon paper proposes pulmonary edema as a possible cause of death and does not prove it [36].
Mixed results23
Common cold
Mixed results: antihistamines slightly eased overall cold symptoms on days one and two in adults, 45% against 38% on placebo, with no difference after that.
Compared with placebo [7]
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- On day one or two, 45% had a beneficial effect on overall severity with an antihistamine against 38% on placebo (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.92). There was no difference at 3 to 4 days or 6 to 10 days. Sedating antihistamines slightly eased runny nose and sneezing on day three, an effect the authors called clinically non-significant [7].
- Population
- 4,342 participants, 212 of them children, in 18 randomized trials of natural and induced colds [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- The review pooled sedating and non-sedating antihistamines [7].
Preventing colds and respiratory infections
Mixed results: a Cochrane review found no single prevention comparison significant, while pooled analyses suggested about 10% to 35% fewer infections.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A Cochrane review of 24 trials (4,631 participants) found none of 12 prevention comparisons reached significance alone, and a post hoc pooling suggested a 10% to 20% relative risk reduction [1]. A 2019 meta-analysis found a risk ratio of 0.78 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.88) for infection [2]. A third meta-analysis of 6 studies (2,458 participants) reported a risk ratio of 0.649 (95% CI 0.545 to 0.774) for recurrent infections and 0.503 for complications such as pneumonia and ear infections [3].
- Population
- Otherwise healthy children and adults [1][2][3].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3]
- Caveats
- Products differed widely in species, plant part and extraction [1]. The Cochrane authors call potential effects of questionable clinical relevance [1]. Review [2] lists selective reporting and protocol deviations. Review [3] used a fixed-effect model and its abstract does not report funding.
Respiratory infections in children
Mixed results: a meta-analysis found fewer infections and less antibiotic use in children, while the largest single trial found no difference in duration or severity.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A 2025 meta-analysis of 9 RCTs (1,518 children on Echinacea purpurea, 1,651 on placebo) found shorter treatment duration for upper respiratory infections (SMD -0.19, 95% CI -0.30 to -0.09), fewer episodes (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.87) and less antibiotic use (RR 0.18, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.25). Ear infection episodes fell (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.73), and ear infection treatment duration did not change (p 0.10) [5]. A 2025 systematic review of 5 RCTs rated the evidence high certainty for shorter symptoms and fewer antibiotics and moderate certainty for preventing infection [6]. In one trial of 407 children aged 2 to 11 with 707 upper respiratory infections, duration, severity, peak severity and days of fever did not differ between Echinacea purpurea and placebo [7].
- Population
- Children in 9 RCTs [5] and 5 RCTs [6]; 407 healthy children in one trial [7].
- Sources
- [5], [6], [7]
- Caveats
- The duration effect is small (SMD -0.19). Products varied in plant part and dosage form, and the funnel plot showed bias linked to heterogeneity [5]. The 5-trial review found some concerns of bias in randomization, allocation concealment, blinding and selective reporting, and did not pool results [6]. The largest single trial found no difference [7].
Flu and flu-like illness, Oscillococcinum
Mixed results: Oscillococcinum did not prevent flu-like illness more than placebo, and two low-quality trials found slightly more symptom relief at 48 hours.
Compared with placebo [10]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- For prevention, flu-like illness did not differ from placebo (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.17 to 1.34, 2 trials). For treatment, symptom relief at 48 hours was 7.7 percentage points more common than with placebo (RR 1.86, 95% CI 1.27 to 2.73), smaller at 3 days (RR 1.27), and not different at 4 days (RR 1.11) or 5 days (RR 1.06). The reviewers found insufficient good evidence for robust conclusions [10].
- Population
- 6 trials: 327 young to middle-aged adults in two prevention trials in Russia, and 1,196 teenagers and adults in four treatment trials in France and Germany [10].
- Sources
- [10]
- Caveats
- Trial reporting was poor and many methods had unclear risk of bias. Only 2 treatment trials could be fully analyzed [10].
Respiratory infections
Mixed results: one review found fewer respiratory infections in children but not adults, and another found no difference in children.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 25 studies, respiratory infection incidence fell in infants and children (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.98) but not in adults (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.32). In adults, IL-6 fell by 24.9 pg/mL, while CRP and NK cell activity did not change [4]. A 2025 meta-analysis of 8 trials in people under 18 found no significant difference in upper respiratory infections (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.40) [2].
- Population
- 20 studies in adults and 5 in children [4]. 8 trials in children [2].
- Sources
- [4], [2]
- Caveats
- The two reviews differ on children [4][2]. The authors of the first describe the clinical studies as limited. The review was supported by an Australian government grant in partnership with Freedom Foods Group Nutritionals [4].
Cancer
Mixed results: one trial and pooled trials found slightly less total cancer, while another trial found no change. Two trials found less lung cancer.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Pooling 4 RCTs (48,859 people), multivitamins were associated with lower cancer incidence (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.99) and lung cancer (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.95, 2 RCTs) [4]. In the Physicians' Health Study II, total cancer fell from 18.3 to 17.0 per 1,000 person-years (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.86 to 0.998), with no change in prostate or colorectal cancer [5]. In COSMOS, invasive cancer did not differ (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.09), and lung cancer was lower (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.92) [2].
- Population
- Healthy adults without known deficiency [4]; male physicians over 11.2 years [5]; older US adults over 3.6 years [2].
- Sources
- [2], [4], [5]
- Caveats
- The trials disagree on total cancer. Absolute risk differences in the adequately powered trials ranged from -0.2% to -1.2% [4]. The Task Force review noted important limitations in the multivitamin evidence [4].
Upper respiratory infections
Mixed results: one review found fewer respiratory infections and shorter episodes, while a later review found no significant drop in infections.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 23 trials (6,950 children, adults and older people), probiotics reduced the number with at least one infection (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.87, low certainty) and at least three infections (RR 0.59, moderate certainty), shortened episodes by 1.22 days (95% CI -2.12 to -0.33), and reduced antibiotic use (RR 0.58) [15]. A 2026 review of 32 RCTs found no significant pooled drop in infection incidence (risk difference -0.07, 95% CI -0.23 to 0.09), while some strains shortened symptoms and cut antibiotic use [16]. Across 13 RCTs of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG, respiratory episodes fell (MD -0.14, 95% CI -0.27 to -0.01) [17].
- Population
- People in community, care facilities, schools and hospitals [15]. RCTs of oral or topical probiotics [16]. People given LGG for prevention or treatment [17].
- Sources
- [15], [16], [17]
- Caveats
- Most outcomes were low certainty [15]. Heterogeneity in [16] was very high (I² 93%) and certainty very low. The reviews disagree on incidence.
Quitting smoking
Mixed results: topiramate raised quit rates at 4 to 12 weeks against placebo, but prolonged abstinence did not differ in a meta-analysis of five trials.
Compared with placebo [11]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Prolonged abstinence did not differ from placebo (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.57 to 2.5). Abstinence at single time points was higher at weeks 4, 6, 8 and 12, with an OR of 2.45 (95% CI 1.37 to 4.39) at week 12 [11].
- Population
- Smokers in 5 trials [11].
- Sources
- [11]
- Caveats
- Few trials, and publication bias could not be excluded [11].
Catching colds and how long they last
Not shown to prevent colds in the general population, though colds were 8% shorter in adults. Risk halved in people under heavy physical stress.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In general community trials, regular vitamin C did not change the risk of catching a cold (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.00). In marathon runners, skiers and soldiers on subarctic exercises, the risk halved (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.64). Regular supplementation shortened colds by 8% in adults (95% CI 3% to 12%) and 14% in children. Taken only once a cold had started, vitamin C showed no consistent effect on duration or severity [1].
- Population
- 29 trial comparisons with 11,306 participants for incidence, 10,708 of them in community trials and 598 under heavy physical stress. 31 comparisons covering 9,745 cold episodes for duration [1].
- Sources
- [1]
- Caveats
- Trials used at least 0.2 g a day. The therapeutic trials were few, 7 comparisons [1].
VO2 max, Garmin Forerunner 245
Mixed results: three studies found Garmin Forerunner 245 estimates within 6 to 8% of laboratory VO2 max on average, underestimating by 6 mL/kg/min in highly trained athletes.
The numbers and sources
- Device
- Garmin Forerunner 245, software version 13.00 in one study [8]
- Compared with
- Respiratory gas analysis during a treadmill ramp test
- Effect
- In 23 runners, mean absolute percentage error after three outdoor runs was 5.7%, against a 4.0% coefficient of variation for the laboratory test itself. Error was 7.1% at lower fitness and -6.2% at the highest fitness [9]. In 35 endurance athletes, the watch underestimated by 4.73 and 4.05 mL/kg/min over two runs (error 7.9% and 7.2%, intraclass correlation 0.71 and 0.75). Error was 2.8 to 4.1% in moderately trained athletes and 9.4 to 10.4% in highly trained athletes, where the watch read 6.3 mL/kg/min low [10]. In 24 trained youth soccer players, error was 5.58% after one run with an intraclass correlation of 0.37 [8].
- Population
- 23 runners with peak oxygen uptake of 38 to 61 mL/kg/min [9]. 35 endurance athletes, mean age 25.1, mean VO2 max 60.1 [10]. 24 trained male youth soccer players [8].
- Sources
- [9], [10], [8]
- Caveats
- Trained runners and athletes, with one research group contributing to all three studies. The authors of one study state laboratory gas analysis remains preferred when precision is required [10].
VO2 max, wearables using exercise data pooled
Mixed results: a meta-analysis found exercise-based watch estimates averaged within 0.1 mL/kg/min of laboratory VO2 max, with limits of agreement of about 10 either way.
The numbers and sources
- Device
- Consumer wearables that estimate from exercise data, pooled [15]. Mostly Garmin watches paired with chest strap heart rate sensors [16].
- Compared with
- Laboratory VO2 max testing
- Effect
- In a meta-analysis of 14 validation studies, wearables using exercise-based data had a bias of -0.09 mL/kg/min with limits of agreement from -9.92 to 9.74. The authors concluded these estimates suit population-level measurement and that error for an individual is large [15]. A later systematic review of 13 studies found the wearable valid or acceptable for VO2 max in 7 of them, with estimates generated from submaximal outdoor runs, and questioned usefulness in elite endurance athletes [16].
- Population
- 14 validation studies [15]. 13 studies of untrained adults, recreational athletes and highly trained athletes [16].
- Sources
- [15], [16]
- Caveats
- The journal published a correction to the meta-analysis in 2026, and the figures here are those in the article's abstract [17].
Common cold symptoms
Limited evidence: four trials in adults with a cold found mixed results, with nasal obstruction improved in two and sore throat or malaise not improved in two.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A Cochrane review found 4 trials and did not pool them because designs and outcomes differed. Nasal obstruction improved on acetaminophen in 2 of the 4. One found less runny nose and no difference in sneezing or coughing. Sore throat and malaise did not improve in 2 of the 4. Headache and achiness improved more than on placebo in 2 studies and did not differ in 1. No study reported how long cold symptoms lasted [15].
- Population
- 758 adults with a common cold in 4 trials, 3 of them lasting 4 to 6 hours [15].
- Sources
- [15]
- Caveats
- Short trials with inconsistent results. One used acetaminophen combined with pseudoephedrine [15].
11 more
Endurance and aerobic capacity
Small trials found mixed results: one review found better endurance in athletes, while trained cyclists showed no change and older adults gained in thresholds only.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a meta-analysis of fungal supplements in athletes (14 RCTs, 528 athletes, 8 pooled), Cordyceps sinensis improved endurance (p 0.05), ventilatory threshold (p 0.03) and VO2 peak (p 0.04) [1]. In 22 trained male cyclists, 3 g a day of CordyMax Cs-4 for 5 weeks did not change VO2 peak, ventilatory threshold or time trial results [2]. In 20 adults aged 50 to 75, Cs-4 for 12 weeks raised metabolic threshold 10.5% and ventilatory threshold 8.5%, and VO2 max did not change [3]. In 28 young adults, a mushroom blend with Cordyceps militaris showed no change after 1 week, and in the 10 who continued for 3 weeks VO2 max rose 4.8 mL/kg/min [4].
- Population
- Athletes [1], trained cyclists [2], healthy older adults [3], young adults [4].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [3], [4]
- Caveats
- Trials are small and disagree. The meta-analysis abstract gives p-values without effect sizes, and its search included a Chinese database [1]. Trial [4] tested a blend, not cordyceps alone.
Flu duration
Small trials found mixed results: one saw flu symptoms ease about 4 days sooner, and a later trial of 87 patients saw no difference.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 60 Norwegian adults with flu symptoms for 48 hours or less, 15 mL of elderberry syrup four times a day for 5 days relieved symptoms about 4 days sooner than placebo, with less rescue medicine [4]. In a 2020 trial of 87 emergency room patients with PCR-confirmed flu, days until symptoms were none or mild were 5.3 on elderberry and 4.9 on placebo (p 0.57), and days to full resolution were 8.6 and 8.7 [5]. The systematic review rated the flu duration evidence uncertain [2].
- Population
- 60 adults aged 18 to 54 [4]. 87 patients aged 5 and older [5].
- Sources
- [4], [2], [5]
- Caveats
- The two trials disagree. The 2020 trial was powered above 0.90 to detect a 2-day difference and was funded by the Wendel Family Foundation and Cleveland Clinic [5]. The abstract of [4] does not report funding.
COVID-19
Limited evidence: famotidine was not linked to fewer deaths in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, and one small outpatient trial found faster symptom improvement but no difference in time to resolution.
Compared with patients not given famotidine [9]; placebo [10]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In hospitalized patients, famotidine use was not associated with the composite of death, intubation or intensive care (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.16) or with death (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.73) [9]. In outpatients with mild to moderate illness, time to symptom resolution did not differ, but a 50% drop in symptom scores came at 8.2 days on famotidine and 11.4 days on placebo [10].
- Population
- 4 observational studies with 46,435 patients, 3,110 on famotidine [9]; 55 non-hospitalized adults, median age 35, randomized [10].
- Sources
- [9], [10]
- Caveats
- The pooled studies were observational with heterogeneity of 84% to 88% [9]. The trial was a small phase 2 study [10].
Hay fever, allergies and allergic asthma
Mixed results: early small trials found less nasal blockage than placebo, and later trials in allergic asthma and hay fever found no difference.
Compared with placebo [5][12][13][14]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In an early pooled analysis, four trials of one remedy for seasonal allergies favored homeopathy for eye symptoms at 4 weeks (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.51 to 2.74) [5]. In 51 people with perennial allergic rhinitis, a 30c dilution of their main allergen improved nasal airflow by 19.8 L/min more than placebo (95% CI 10.4 to 29.1), and symptom scores did not differ [12]. In 242 people with asthma allergic to house dust mite, homeopathic immunotherapy did not differ from placebo on most outcomes over 16 weeks [13]. In 62 people with seasonal allergic rhinitis, neither a standard nor an individualized remedy improved quality of life more than placebo [14].
- Population
- 4 trials [5]. 51 adults in Scotland [12]. 242 adults in 38 English general practices [13]. 62 adults in Germany [14].
- Sources
- [5], [12], [13], [14]
- Caveats
- The 2026 trial reached about a quarter of its planned size [14]. The 51-person trial was run by the group whose three earlier trials it added to [12].
Furosemide before a blood transfusion
Limited evidence: four small trials of furosemide before transfusion measured only breathing and pressure markers, and a Cochrane review found too little evidence to judge clinical benefit.
Compared with no diuretic or placebo before transfusion [13]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- One study found better inspired oxygen fraction and two found better pulmonary capillary wedge pressure with furosemide. None measured clinically important outcomes such as transfusion-related fluid overload [13].
- Population
- 100 people in 4 trials [13].
- Sources
- [13]
- Caveats
- Too small and too narrow to show clinical benefit or harm [13].
Sleep apnea severity
Mixed results: two small uncontrolled studies found sleep apnea events fell by 35% to 47% with tape, while three other studies found no significant change.
Compared with before taping, in the same people [1][2]; sleeping without tape the night before, in the same people [3]; other treatments and placebo spray in studies summarized by a review [4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 20 mouth breathers with mild sleep apnea, median apnea-hypopnea index fell from 8.3 to 4.7 events an hour after a week of taping (p = 0.0002), and the oxygen desaturation index fell from 8.7 to 5.8 [1]. In 30 patients with mild sleep apnea, a porous oral patch lowered median apnea-hypopnea index from 12.0 to 7.8 an hour (P < 0.01) [2]. A systematic review of 10 studies found these two significant improvements, while three studies found no significant change in apnea-hypopnea index [4]. In 71 adults, oxygen desaturation did not improve with tape in about half of participants [3].
- Population
- 20 adults with mild sleep apnea who breathed through the mouth and tolerated tape [1]. 30 patients with mild sleep apnea [2]. 213 patients in 10 studies [4]. 71 adults with a two-night home sleep test [3].
- Sources
- [4], [1], [2], [3]
- Caveats
- No randomized trial against an untaped group or sham tape. Many studies excluded anyone with nasal obstruction [4]. The reviewers describe a potentially serious risk of harm in people taping indiscriminately [4].
Exercise performance with hyperventilation breathwork
Mixed results: a systematic review of Wim Hof Method trials found mixed effects of its breathing on exercise performance and on breathing during exercise.
Compared with control conditions the source abstract does not describe [19]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In a narrative synthesis of 9 papers from 8 trials, the effect of Wim Hof breathing on exercise performance was mixed, as were effects on minute ventilation, tidal volume and breathing frequency after exercise [19].
- Population
- Healthy people and people with medical conditions aged over 14 in 8 trials [19].
- Sources
- [19]
- Caveats
- No pooled estimate. Trials were small.
VO2 max, Apple Watch Series 7
Mixed results: one study of 19 adults found Apple Watch Series 7 estimates averaged 4.5 mL/kg/min below laboratory VO2 max, with a mean error of 15.8%.
The numbers and sources
- Device
- Apple Watch Series 7
- Compared with
- Gas analysis during a graded cycle ergometer test to exhaustion
- Effect
- Laboratory VO2 max averaged 45.88 mL/kg/min (SD 9.42) against 41.37 (SD 6.5) from the watch (P = .01). Mean absolute percentage error was 15.79%, root mean square error 8.85 mL/kg/min and intraclass correlation 0.47 (95% CI 0.06 to 0.75). The authors reported acceptable overall agreement on Bland-Altman analysis alongside low reliability, with overestimation at low fitness and underestimation at high fitness [2].
- Population
- 19 adults (7 women) aged 18 to 63, who wore the watch for at least 2 days and completed an outdoor run [2].
- Sources
- [2]
- Caveats
- Nineteen participants. The laboratory test was on a cycle and the watch estimate came from running [2].
VO2 max, Garmin Forerunner 230 and Polar V800
Mixed results: one study of 44 adults found random errors of 6.6 to 16.4 mL/kg/min for two watches, with the resting-based estimate overestimating in men.
The numbers and sources
- Device
- Garmin Forerunner 230, which estimates from a 10 minute outdoor run, and Polar V800, which estimates from heart rate at rest
- Compared with
- A treadmill VO2 max test
- Effect
- Bland-Altman analysis showed random errors from 6.6 to 16.4 mL/kg/min, larger for the Polar watch. In men, the Polar estimate ran 3.87 mL/kg/min above the Garmin estimate (p = 0.013). The authors concluded the Garmin watch estimated VO2 max in both sexes and the Polar watch in women but not men, and that both carry large random error [7].
- Population
- 22 women and 22 men [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- The abstract does not report mean bias against the laboratory for each watch. Published in 2021 [7].
VO2 max, Google Pixel Watch 3
Mixed results: one study of 34 adults found Pixel Watch 3 estimates within 0.5 mL/kg/min of laboratory VO2 max on average, with limits of agreement of 12 either way.
The numbers and sources
- Device
- Google Pixel Watch 3
- Compared with
- Indirect calorimetry during a maximal treadmill test
- Effect
- Bias was -0.53 mL/kg/min with limits of agreement from -12.56 to 11.50 and a mean absolute percentage error of 8.65%. The authors concluded the estimates lack individual-level validity for clinical use while the low bias suggests use for population monitoring. In the same study, heart rate bias was -2.39 beats per minute (error 2.73%) and energy expenditure error 15.02% [13].
- Population
- 34 participants, with watch estimates generated in daily life [13].
- Sources
- [13]
- Caveats
- One watch generation and 34 participants [13].
VO2 max, Polar Fitness Test on Polar Vantage M2
Mixed results: one study of 24 adults with cardiovascular risk factors found the resting Polar Fitness Test within 1 mL/kg/min on average, with limits of 11.4 either way.
The numbers and sources
- Device
- Polar Fitness Test, a resting test, run on a Polar Vantage M2
- Compared with
- Cardiopulmonary exercise testing on a treadmill
- Effect
- Mean bias was -1.0 mL/kg/min with limits of agreement of plus or minus 11.4, a mean absolute percentage error of 13.7% and an intraclass correlation of 0.743. One of five walk-test equations performed similarly (error 12.6%). The authors concluded the test may serve at population level and that its variability limits use for individual clinical decisions [14].
- Population
- 24 adults (9 women), mean age 57.4, in medically supervised exercise training, 7 of them on heart rate-limiting medication [14].
- Sources
- [14]
- Caveats
- Twenty-four participants, some on medication that lowers heart rate [14].
Not shown to help26
How long a cold lasts
Not shown to shorten colds in people with new colds. Only 1 of 7 treatment trials found echinacea better than placebo.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Of 7 treatment trials reporting cold duration, only 1 found echinacea better than placebo [1]. A 2019 meta-analysis found a mean difference of -0.45 days, with a confidence interval crossing zero [2]. In 719 patients aged 12 to 80, blinded echinacea shortened colds by a nonsignificant 0.53 days (95% CI -1.25 to 0.19) and lowered global severity by a nonsignificant 28 points [4].
- Population
- People with new-onset colds [1][2][4].
- Sources
- [1], [2], [4]
- Caveats
- The 719-person trial had more variability than expected, which limited power to detect small effects. It was funded by the NIH's National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine [4].
Quitting smoking
Not shown to raise long-term quitting. Quit rates were slightly higher than with sham acupuncture in the short term, and lower than with nicotine replacement.
Compared with sham acupuncture [12]; waiting list [12]; nicotine replacement therapy [12]; psychological interventions [12]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Against sham, acupuncture raised short-term abstinence (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.38) and not long-term abstinence (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.40). Against a waiting list, long-term abstinence did not differ significantly (RR 1.79, 95% CI 0.98 to 3.28, 3 trials). Abstinence was lower with acupuncture than with nicotine replacement, and did not differ from psychological interventions. Electrostimulation did not differ from sham electrostimulation [12].
- Population
- 38 studies of adult smokers [12].
- Sources
- [12]
- Caveats
- Funnel plot asymmetry suggested that larger studies found smaller effects [12].
Spacer or nebulizer in an asthma attack
Not shown to change hospital admission whether a beta-agonist was given by spacer or by nebulizer. Children spent 33 minutes less in the emergency department with a spacer.
Compared with the same drug given by nebulizer [4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Admission did not differ between spacer and nebulizer in adults (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.43) or children (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.08). In children, time in the emergency department was 33 minutes shorter with a spacer, pulse rose less and tremor was less likely (RR 0.64). Lung function was similar [4].
- Population
- 1,897 children and 729 adults with acute asthma in 39 trials [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- Moderate-quality evidence. The trials compared delivery methods, not the drug against placebo [4].
Regular scheduled use against use as needed
Not shown to change lung function or major asthma exacerbations when taken on a schedule rather than as needed, though regular users needed slightly less rescue medicine.
Compared with the same drug used as needed [6]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- No clinically or statistically significant differences were found in airway caliber. Regular treatment groups used 0.80 fewer rescue puffs a day and had 6.7% fewer days with symptoms. The odds of at least one major exacerbation did not differ [6].
- Population
- 49 trials of short-acting beta-agonists in chronic asthma [6].
- Sources
- [6]
- Caveats
- The review dates from 2003, and many trials were crossover studies [6].
As-needed albuterol alone against as-needed budesonide-formoterol
Shown to leave about twice the asthma exacerbation rate of as-needed budesonide-formoterol in adults with mild asthma, 0.400 a year against 0.195.
Compared with as-needed budesonide-formoterol [7][8]; regular budesonide plus as-needed albuterol [7]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Over 52 weeks, the annual exacerbation rate was 0.400 on albuterol as needed and 0.195 on budesonide-formoterol as needed (relative rate 0.49, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.72). Severe exacerbations numbered 23 and 9 (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.86) [7]. Across trials of a fast-acting bronchodilator alone, 109 per 1,000 had an exacerbation needing oral steroids against 52 per 1,000 on budesonide-formoterol as needed (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.60) [8].
- Population
- 668 adults with mild asthma in an open-label trial [7]; 9,657 participants in 6 trials, mean age 36 to 43 [8].
- Sources
- [7], [8]
- Caveats
- The trial was open-label and funded in part by AstraZeneca [7]. In the pooled analysis the fast-acting comparators were terbutaline and formoterol, not albuterol [8].
Endurance performance in people without asthma
Not shown to improve aerobic performance, time trials, time to exhaustion or VO2 max in people without asthma, whatever the beta-agonist, dose or route.
Compared with placebo [10]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Beta-agonists did not change aerobic performance against placebo (SDM 0.051, 95% CI -0.020 to 0.122), with no heterogeneity (I² 0%). The result did not depend on drug type, dose, route, treatment length or athletic level [10].
- Population
- 47 randomized trials with about 680 participants without asthma [10].
- Sources
- [10]
- Caveats
- The analysis pooled several beta-agonists, not albuterol alone [10].
Acute bronchitis and chest infections
Not shown to improve overall recovery from acute bronchitis, with cough about half a day shorter, and amoxicillin did not shorten bad symptoms in a 2,061-person trial.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- The share clinically improved did not differ (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.15). Cough was less frequent at follow-up (RR 0.64, a number needed to treat of 6) and lasted 0.46 days less. Adverse effects were more frequent (RR 1.20), one extra for every 24 treated [4]. In adults with a chest infection not suspected to be pneumonia, amoxicillin 1 g three times daily did not shorten moderately bad symptoms (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.18). New or worse symptoms were 15.9% against 19.3% (number needed to treat 30), and nausea, rash or diarrhea one extra per 21 treated, including in people 60 or older [5].
- Population
- 5,099 people in 17 trials [4]; 2,061 adults in 12 European countries [5].
- Sources
- [4], [5]
- Caveats
- Frail older people with several conditions may have been left out of trials [4].
Common cold and green nasal discharge
Not shown to help the common cold or persisting colored nasal discharge against placebo, while adults given antibiotics for a cold had more side effects.
Compared with placebo [6]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Lack of cure or persistent cold symptoms did not differ (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.14). Persisting purulent rhinitis did not differ (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.13). Adverse effects were more frequent on antibiotics for colds (RR 1.8), in adults (RR 2.62) but not children (RR 0.91), and for purulent rhinitis (RR 1.46) [6].
- Population
- Up to 1,147 people in 6 common cold trials and 723 in 4 purulent rhinitis trials [6].
- Sources
- [6]
- Caveats
- Trials used various antibiotics and outcome measures, and some participants may have had chest or sinus infections [6].
Asthma, high blood pressure and period pain
Not shown to treat asthma in children, high blood pressure or period pain. Every high- or acceptable-quality trial found manipulation no better than sham.
Compared with sham interventions [10]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- All randomized trials of acceptable or high quality found spinal manipulation was not superior to sham for infantile colic, childhood asthma, hypertension, primary dysmenorrhea and migraine. No trial tested whether manipulation prevents any of these conditions [10].
- Population
- 6 randomized trials with 534 participants [10].
- Sources
- [10]
- Caveats
- Few trials for each condition. Six of the 50 researchers at the review summit did not approve the final report [10].
Colds and respiratory infections in children
Not shown to prevent or cure respiratory infections in children. Every trial at low risk of bias found no benefit over placebo.
Compared with identical placebo or self-selected conventional treatment [11]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Non-individualized products had little preventive effect (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.57). Individualized prevention had little effect on antibiotic use (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.76). Short-term cure (OR 1.31 favoring placebo, 95% CI 0.09 to 19.54) and long-term cure (OR 0.99) were too uncertain to judge. All studies at low risk of bias showed no benefit, while trials at uncertain or high risk of bias reported benefits [11].
- Population
- 8 trials with 1,562 children aged 0 to 16 with upper respiratory tract infections [11].
- Sources
- [11]
- Caveats
- Evidence was low or very low in quality, with high attrition and selective reporting. Three trials were funded by homeopathy manufacturers [11].
Quitting smoking
Not shown to raise quit rates at 6 months or more compared with other behavioral support or medication. Group hypnotherapy and group CBT gave similar quit rates.
Compared with attention-matched behavioral treatments, intensive behavioral programs, brief behavioral advice, rapid smoking, quit-smoking medication and no intervention [11]; group cognitive behavioral therapy [12]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Against attention-matched behavioral treatment, quit rates did not differ (RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.61, 6 trials, 957 people). Nor did they differ against intensive behavioral programs (RR 0.93), brief behavioral advice (RR 0.98), rapid smoking (RR 1.00) or medication (RR 1.68, 95% CI 0.88 to 3.20). One trial of 40 people favored hypnotherapy over no intervention (RR 19.00) at very low certainty. Added to other treatment, hypnotherapy raised quitting (RR 2.10, 95% CI 1.31 to 3.35, 5 trials) in studies mostly at high risk of bias [11]. In 360 smokers, continuous abstinence over 12 months was 15.0% with group hypnotherapy and 15.6% with group CBT [12].
- Population
- 1,926 smokers in 14 trials [11]. 360 smokers at two study sites [12].
- Sources
- [11], [12]
- Caveats
- Only one trial in the Cochrane review was at low risk of bias. The reviewers write that any benefit is small at most [11].
Asthma, montelukast alone against an inhaled steroid
Shown to leave more asthma exacerbations needing oral steroids than an inhaled steroid, one extra exacerbation for every 28 people treated with montelukast instead.
Compared with inhaled corticosteroids [2]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- People treated with an anti-leukotriene instead of an inhaled steroid were more likely to have an exacerbation needing oral steroids (RR 1.51, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.96), one more for every 28 treated (95% CI 15 to 82). The gap was larger with moderate airway obstruction (RR 2.03) than mild (RR 1.25) [2].
- Population
- 10,005 adults and 3,333 children with mild or moderate persistent asthma in 56 trials of 4 to 52 weeks [2].
- Sources
- [2]
- Caveats
- The inhaled steroid dose was about 200 µg a day of beclomethasone or equivalent. The review covers anti-leukotrienes as a group [2].
14 more
Added to an inhaled steroid, against an added long-acting beta-agonist
Shown to leave slightly more exacerbations than adding a long-acting beta-agonist to an inhaled steroid, 13% against 11%.
Compared with a long-acting beta-agonist added to the inhaled steroid [4]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Exacerbations needing oral steroids were 13% with an anti-leukotriene plus inhaled steroid and 11% with a long-acting beta-agonist plus inhaled steroid (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.99 favoring the beta-agonist), one fewer for every 62 treated. Lung function, symptoms and rescue use also favored the beta-agonist [4].
- Population
- 7,208 participants in 18 trials, 336 of them children aged 6 to 17 [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- High-quality evidence. The choice of anti-leukotriene did not change the result [4].
Chronic cough
Not shown to resolve long-lasting cough in adults more than placebo overall. In infants, more side effects occurred on a proton pump inhibitor.
Compared with placebo [16]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In adults, pooled data showed no significant difference in total cough resolution (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.19 to 1.15). Cough scores improved only in sensitivity analyses (SMD -0.41). In one infant trial, cough did not improve and adverse events rose (OR 5.56, 95% CI 1.18 to 26.25), one extra event for every 11 infants treated for 4 weeks [16].
- Population
- 19 studies, 13 in adults, of which 9 compared 2 to 3 months of a proton pump inhibitor with placebo [16].
- Sources
- [16]
- Caveats
- Trials differed in how they measured cough. Children's studies could not be combined [16].
Asthma in people with reflux
Not shown to consistently improve lung function, asthma symptoms or asthma medicine use in people with asthma and reflux.
Compared with control groups the abstract does not describe [17]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Anti-reflux treatment did not consistently improve lung function, asthma symptoms, night-time asthma or use of asthma medicines. The authors suggested some subgroups may benefit but could not predict which [17].
- Population
- 12 trials, 6 of proton pump inhibitors, lasting 1 week to 6 months, in adults and children with asthma and reflux [17].
- Sources
- [17]
- Caveats
- The review pooled proton pump inhibitors with H2 blockers, surgery and lifestyle measures, and dates from 2003 [17].
COVID-19
Not shown to lower death, ventilation or hospital stay in patients with COVID-19 in randomized trials. A review adding cohort studies found lower mortality.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 9 RCTs, vitamin C did not change death from any cause (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.02), need for ventilation (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.11) or length of hospital stay (MD -0.63 days, 95% CI -3.04 to 1.78) [3]. Across 13 studies, short-term mortality (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.17) and in-hospital mortality (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.16) did not change [4]. A review that also pooled cohort and retrospective studies found lower mortality (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.80) [5].
- Population
- Patients with COVID-19, 9 RCTs [3]; 13 studies with 12,062 participants [4]; 22 studies with 3,429 hospitalized patients [5].
- Sources
- [3], [4], [5]
- Caveats
- Sources disagree. The review that found lower mortality pooled cohort and retrospective studies [5]. Certainty ranged from very low to moderate [4].
Respiratory infections
Not shown to clearly lower respiratory infections in people. An earlier review found one point fewer, which lost significance in a 2025 update.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Across 37 trials with primary outcome data (48,488 participants aged 0 to 95), 61.3% on vitamin D and 62.3% on placebo had one or more acute respiratory infections (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.86 to 0.99, I² 35.6%) [12]. A 2025 update by the same group added 3 trials with 16,085 participants. Across 40 studies (61,589 participants), the effect was no longer statistically significant (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.00, P 0.057, I² 26.4%), and age, baseline vitamin D status, dosing frequency and dose size did not modify it [13]. In 17 pediatric RCTs (18,372 children), infections did not fall significantly (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.06), and daily doses of 1,000 IU or less had RR 0.42 (95% CI 0.27 to 0.66) [14]. A Cochrane review of children up to 5 found RR 0.95 (95% CI 0.91 to 1.00) for the share making infection-related healthcare visits, and no change in visits per child [15]. Across 6 RCTs (15,677 participants), tuberculosis infection (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.14) and active tuberculosis (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.05) did not differ from placebo [16]. In 1,747 adults newly diagnosed with COVID-19, a 4-week course did not change healthcare visits or death (28% against 29%, OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.24) [17].
- Population
- 46 double-blind RCTs, 75,541 participants [12]; 40 placebo-controlled studies, 61,589 participants [13]; children in 17 RCTs [14] and 107 RCTs from pregnancy to age 5 (31,521 participants) [15]; people without active tuberculosis [16]; adults in the US and Mongolia [17].
- Sources
- [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17]
- Caveats
- The 2021 and 2025 analyses come from the same group and share most trials. The 2021 absolute difference was one percentage point [12]. The 2025 funnel plot was asymmetric (Egger P 0.002) [13]. The Cochrane result rests on low-certainty evidence [15].
VO2 max, wearables using resting data pooled
Not shown to match laboratory VO2 max when based on resting data. A meta-analysis found a 2.2 mL/kg/min overestimate with limits of agreement from 13 below to 17 above.
The numbers and sources
- Device
- Consumer wearables that estimate from resting data, pooled
- Compared with
- Laboratory VO2 max testing
- Effect
- Wearables using resting information significantly overestimated VO2 max, with a bias of 2.17 mL/kg/min and limits of agreement from -13.07 to 17.41. The authors concluded exercise-based estimates were closer to laboratory values than resting-based ones [15].
- Population
- 14 validation studies across both estimate types [15].
- Sources
- [15]
- Caveats
- The journal published a correction to the meta-analysis in 2026, and the figures here are those in the article's abstract [17].
Catching a cold, zinc taken daily
Not shown to prevent colds in children and adults taking zinc daily.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Zinc made little or no difference to the risk of developing a cold (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.01, 9 studies, 1,449 participants, low certainty). When colds occurred, their length did not differ (MD -0.63 days, 95% CI -1.29 to 0.04, moderate certainty) [1].
- Population
- 15 prevention trials in children and adults [1].
- Sources
- [1]
- Caveats
- Trials mixed common cold and upper respiratory infection definitions.
Preventing colds
Limited evidence: cold episodes did not differ significantly from placebo in air travelers, and a review found elderberry may not lower cold risk.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In 312 air travelers, cold episodes were 12 on elderberry and 17 on placebo, a difference that was not significant (p 0.4) [3]. The systematic review found elderberry may not reduce the risk of developing a cold [2].
- Population
- Air travelers [3], 5 RCTs [2].
- Sources
- [3], [2]
- Caveats
- Few prevention trials.
Cardiovascular effects compared with exercise
One small trial found 45 minutes of infrared sauna raised body temperature but did not reproduce the breathing or cardiovascular responses of moderate cycling in 10 women.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Tympanic temperature was 1.05°C higher during infrared sauna than rest and 0.79°C higher than cycling. Respiratory rate was 6.66 breaths a minute higher during cycling than sauna. Blood pressure, arterial stiffness and heart rate variability did not differ between sauna, cycling and rest [11].
- Population
- 10 healthy women, mean age 36, in a randomized crossover of rest, infrared sauna and indoor cycling [11].
- Sources
- [11]
- Caveats
- Ten women, single sessions.
Asthma control
One crossover trial of 51 adults with asthma found 4 weeks of nightly mouth taping did not change peak flow, symptoms or any secondary measure.
Compared with usual breathing at night [7]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- Participants taped for a median 26 of 28 nights. Morning peak expiratory flow differed by -1 L/min (95% CI -9 to 7) and symptom scores by -0.12 (95% CI -0.30 to 0.06), and no secondary measure differed [7].
- Population
- 51 adults with symptomatic asthma, mean FEV1 86% of predicted [7].
- Sources
- [7]
- Caveats
- Single-blind assessment, since participants knew when they taped [7].
COVID-19
Limited evidence: pooled trials found ozone did not shorten hospital stays or reduce intensive care admissions or deaths from COVID-19, though fewer PCR tests stayed positive.
Compared with placebo, sham, saline or standard care [12]
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- In meta-analyses of randomized trials, ozone therapy lowered PCR positivity at follow-up (RR 0.07, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.34), which the reviewers judged a clinically unimportant surrogate. Hospital stay, intensive care admission and mortality did not differ [12].
- Population
- Meta-analyses of trials in patients with COVID-19, within an umbrella review of 7 meta-analyses [12].
- Sources
- [12]
- Caveats
- Certainty was low or very low for every outcome in the umbrella review, and safety outcomes were reported inconsistently [12].
VO2 max, Apple Watch Series 9 and Ultra 2
One study of 30 adults found Apple Watch estimates averaged 6.1 mL/kg/min below laboratory VO2 max, with a mean error of 13.3%.
The numbers and sources
- Device
- Apple Watch on watchOS 10 or later, mostly Series 9 (17 participants) and Ultra 2 (6), with a few Series 5 to 8 and SE 2
- Compared with
- Indirect calorimetry during a maximal treadmill test
- Effect
- The watch underestimated VO2 max by a mean 6.07 mL/kg/min (95% CI 3.77 to 8.38), with limits of agreement from -6.11 to 18.26. Mean absolute percentage error was 13.31% (95% CI 10.01 to 16.61) and mean absolute error 6.92 mL/kg/min. The authors concluded the estimates need refinement before clinical use [3].
- Population
- 30 participants who wore a watch for 5 to 10 days to generate an estimate. Most had fitness in the "good" to "superior" categories [3].
- Sources
- [3]
- Caveats
- A fit sample, with one participant in the "fair" category and none lower. The authors declared no competing interests [3].
VO2 max, Apple Watch Series 10
One study of 40 adults found Apple Watch Series 10 estimates averaged 6.3 mL/kg/min below laboratory VO2 max and placed 14% of participants in the right fitness band.
The numbers and sources
- Device
- Apple Watch Series 10 running watchOS 11
- Compared with
- Indirect calorimetry during a maximal treadmill test
- Effect
- The mean difference was -6.25 mL/kg/min (95% CI -8.28 to -4.23), with limits of agreement from -18.23 to 5.73. Mean absolute error was 6.79 mL/kg/min and mean absolute percentage error 13.2% (95% CI 9.6 to 16.8). Against published fitness percentile bands, the watch placed 5 participants (14%) in the correct band and a further 12 (34%) within one adjacent band. The authors described individual-level agreement as low and suggested use for population-level assessment [4].
- Population
- 40 healthy adults (20 women), tested between October 2024 and January 2025 [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- One watch generation and software version. Supported by Ireland's Health Research Board, and the authors reported no competing interests [4].
VO2 max, Garmin Forerunner 920XT and Polar V800
One study of 24 adults judged VO2 max estimates from two sports watches not valid, with error of 7.3% for one and above 10% for the other.
The numbers and sources
- Device
- Garmin Forerunner 920XT and Polar V800
- Compared with
- Indirect calorimetry
- Effect
- Mean absolute percentage error was 7.3% for the Garmin Forerunner 920XT, which significantly underestimated VO2 max (p = 0.027), and above 10% for the Polar V800. The authors concluded the tested devices did not give valid estimates of VO2 max [12].
- Population
- 24 healthy adults [12].
- Sources
- [12]
- Caveats
- Published in 2019. The same study tested three other wrist devices for energy expenditure only [12].
Checked, no increase found3
Cough
Not shown to raise cough above placebo. Cough was reported by 1.1% on telmisartan against 4.2% on ramipril in one large trial.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- Common: between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people.
- Effect
- In two trials of people who had coughed on an ACE inhibitor, cough returned in 17% on losartan, 25% on hydrochlorothiazide and 69% on lisinopril in the first, and in 29% on losartan, 35% on placebo and 62% on lisinopril in the second [10]. In ONTARGET, cough was reported by 1.1% on telmisartan and 4.2% on ramipril [16]. Across randomized trials, cough was 3.2 times as frequent on ACE inhibitors as on ARBs (95% CI 2.91 to 3.51) [24].
- Population
- People with prior ACE inhibitor cough in two losartan trials [10]; 17,118 people in ONTARGET [16]; 135 randomized trials [24].
- Sources
- [10], [16], [24]
- Caveats
- The losartan label notes that cough, including on rechallenge, has been reported after marketing [10].
Serious asthma events with combination inhalers
Not shown to raise serious asthma events when a long-acting beta-agonist was combined with an inhaled steroid, 0.66% against 0.60% on the steroid alone.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Hospitalization, intubation or death from asthma occurred in 0.66% on a combination inhaler and 0.60% on an inhaled steroid alone (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.43). There were three asthma intubations and two asthma deaths, both deaths on combination therapy [5]. The label states that a long-acting beta-agonist used alone, without an inhaled steroid, raises the risk of asthma-related death [15].
- Population
- 36,010 people aged 12 and older in four 26-week trials [5].
- Sources
- [5], [15]
- Caveats
- The label states the trials were not designed to rule out all risk [15].
Asthma flare-ups in children
One trial found as-needed acetaminophen did not raise asthma flare-ups against ibuprofen in young children with mild persistent asthma.
The numbers and sources
- How common
- How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
- Effect
- Over 46 weeks of follow-up, asthma exacerbations averaged 0.81 per child on acetaminophen and 0.87 on ibuprofen (relative rate 0.94, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.28). At least one exacerbation occurred in 49% and 47%. Asthma-control days (85.8% and 86.8%) and rescue inhaler use did not differ [30].
- Population
- 300 children aged 12 to 59 months with mild persistent asthma, given acetaminophen or ibuprofen as needed for fever or pain [30].
- Sources
- [30]
- Caveats
- One trial with no placebo group, so it compares the two drugs with each other.
Not studied in people2
Lung health, cough and asthma
Not studied in people. The EU medicines agency lists mullein flower tea as a traditional herbal medicine for sore throat with dry cough and cold, based on long-standing use.
No study in people. This rests on documented traditional use.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- The European Union herbal monograph adopted by the European Medicines Agency's herbal committee in 2018 lists mullein flower, as a tea taken by mouth, as a traditional herbal medicinal product used to relieve symptoms of sore throat associated with dry cough and cold. It states the indication rests exclusively on long-standing use, and gives no well-established use indication [3].
- Population
- Traditional use in Europe, as reviewed by the European Medicines Agency [3].
- Sources
- [3]
- Caveats
- Traditional use is a record of how long people have used it, not a test of its effect. The monograph covers sore throat with dry cough and cold only, not asthma, bronchitis or lung health. No controlled trial in people was located.
Suffocation if the nose is blocked
Not studied in people. Researchers warn of asphyxiation when the mouth is taped and the nose is blocked, and many studies excluded people with nasal obstruction.
No study in people. This rests on how it acts in the body.
The numbers and sources
- Effect
- A systematic review records authors' warnings against indiscriminate long-term home taping because of the risk of asphyxia in the presence of nasal obstruction, machine or power failure, or regurgitation, and notes that many studies excluded anyone with nasal obstruction or pathology [4].
- Population
- Studies summarized in a systematic review [4].
- Sources
- [4]
- Caveats
- No case or rate of suffocation from mouth taping was located. The warning follows from blocking the only other airway.