← Back

Research · Diets

Atkins diet

Trials that tested Atkins by name found weight loss within a few kilograms of other popular diets, more than Zone in one trial and similar in another. Triglycerides fell more than on higher-carbohydrate diets in two trials. The modified Atkins diet reduced seizures in drug-resistant epilepsy. Thiamine, folate, vitamin C, iron and magnesium intake fell short more often.

Add to Bio HackChecked 2026-11-13
Status
A dietary pattern and a commercial program, not a regulated product.
Also called
Atkins, Dr. Atkins diet, Atkins 20, Atkins 40, modified Atkins diet, MAD, low-carbohydrate high-protein high-fat diet
Followed for
weight loss, triglycerides, heart health, blood sugar, epilepsy

Strong several reviews agree · Moderate one review or consistent trials · Limited one or a few small studies · Untested no study in people, listed with what it rests on

What people follow it for, and what was found

Shown to help2

ModerateVery common

Seizures in drug-resistant epilepsy (modified Atkins)

Shown to make a 50% seizure reduction about six times as likely as drug therapy alone in drug-resistant epilepsy, though less often than the classic ketogenic diet in children.

Compared with a usual diet with the same antiseizure drugs [1]; standard care with no diet therapy [2]; usual care [3]; standard drug therapy alone [4]; the classic ketogenic diet and a low glycemic index diet [5]; the classic ketogenic diet [6]

The numbers and sources
How common
Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
Effect
In 6 RCTs (575 patients), the modified Atkins diet added to drug therapy made a 50% or greater seizure reduction more likely than drug therapy alone (RR 6.28, 95% CI 3.52 to 10.50), in children (RR 6.28) and adults (RR 6.14, 95% CI 1.15 to 32.66), and made seizure freedom more likely (RR 5.94, 95% CI 1.93 to 18.31) [1]. In adolescents and adults, 23% on the diet had a 50% reduction (95% CI 10% to 37%), RR 6.47 (95% CI 1.60 to 26.14) [2]. A Cochrane review rated the adult evidence very uncertain (RR 5.03, 95% CI 0.26 to 97.68, 2 studies), and found up to 25% of children seizure free and up to 60% with a 50% reduction [3]. In 160 adolescents and adults over 6 months, 26.2% had a 50% reduction against 2.5% on drugs alone [4]. In children, median seizure frequency fell 45% on the modified Atkins diet and 66% on the classic ketogenic diet, and the modified Atkins diet did not meet the trial's noninferiority margin [5]. A 2026 meta-analysis found the classic diet more likely to halve seizures (OR 0.55 for the modified Atkins diet, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.87), with no difference in seizure freedom [6].
Population
Children and adults with drug-resistant epilepsy on antiseizure medication [1][2][3][4]; 170 children aged 1 to 15 in India [5]; children in 8 studies, experimental and observational [6].
Sources
[1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]
Caveats
Average follow-up was 12 weeks [1]. Only 3 RCTs were in the adolescent and adult review [2], and its lead author also led trial [4]. Cochrane certainty was very low [3]. This is a medically supervised version used for epilepsy, not the weight-loss program.
Moderate

Triglycerides and HDL cholesterol

Shown in two trials to lower triglycerides more than higher-carbohydrate diets in adults with overweight, while a third found similar heart risk changes across four diets.

Compared with the Zone, LEARN and Ornish diets [7]; the Zone, Weight Watchers and Ornish diets [8]; a conventional low-calorie, high-carbohydrate, low-fat diet [9]; a high-carbohydrate, high-fibre diet and the high-protein Zone diet [11]

The numbers and sources
Effect
HDL rose and triglycerides fell more on Atkins than on a conventional diet through most of a year, with no difference in total or LDL cholesterol after 3 months [9]. Triglycerides fell 0.30 mmol/L more than on a high-carbohydrate diet in insulin-resistant women [11]. At 12 months, Atkins secondary outcomes, including lipids, were comparable with or more favorable than Zone, LEARN and Ornish [7]. In another trial, each of four diets lowered the LDL to HDL ratio by about 10%, with no significant change in blood pressure or glucose [8].
Population
Adults with obesity [9]; insulin-resistant women [11]; premenopausal women [7]; adults with cardiac risk factors [8].
Sources
[7], [8], [9], [11]
Caveats
Small trials with high dropout. Blood markers, not heart attacks or strokes.

Mixed results1

Moderate

Weight loss

Mixed results: Atkins produced more weight loss than Zone in one trial and similar loss to other popular diets in another, with gaps shrinking by 12 months.

Compared with the Zone, LEARN and Ornish diets [7]; the Zone, Weight Watchers and Ornish diets [8]; a conventional low-calorie, high-carbohydrate, low-fat diet [9]; the Zone diet and other named diet programs [10]; a high-carbohydrate, high-fibre diet and the high-protein Zone diet [11]

The numbers and sources
Effect
At 12 months, women lost 4.7 kg on Atkins (95% CI 3.1 to 6.3), 1.6 kg on Zone, 2.6 kg on LEARN and 2.2 kg on Ornish, and only the Atkins and Zone difference was significant [7]. In another 1-year trial, mean loss was 2.1 kg on Atkins, 3.2 kg on Zone, 3.0 kg on Weight Watchers and 3.3 kg on Ornish, and weight loss tracked self-reported adherence (r 0.60), not diet type (r 0.07) [8]. Against a conventional low-fat diet, Atkins produced more loss at 3 months (6.8% against 2.7% of body weight) and 6 months (7.0% against 3.2%), and the 12-month difference (4.4% against 2.5%) was not significant [9]. In a network meta-analysis, Atkins produced 1.71 kg more loss than Zone at 6 months, and differences between named diets were minimal [10]. In insulin-resistant women, Atkins produced 2.8 kg more loss than a high-carbohydrate diet [11].
Population
311 premenopausal women with overweight or obesity [7]; 160 adults aged 22 to 72 with hypertension, dyslipidemia or high fasting glucose [8]; 63 adults with obesity [9]; 7,286 adults in 48 trials [10]; 96 insulin-resistant women [11].
Sources
[7], [8], [9], [10], [11]
Caveats
Adherence was poor and dropout high in several trials [8][9]. Most trials ran 12 months or less.

Not shown to help1

Moderate

Blood sugar and insulin

Not shown to change blood sugar or insulin more than other diets in adults with overweight in three trials.

Compared with the Zone, Weight Watchers and Ornish diets [8]; a conventional low-calorie, high-carbohydrate, low-fat diet [9]; a high-carbohydrate, high-fibre diet and the high-protein Zone diet [11]

The numbers and sources
Effect
No diet, Atkins included, significantly changed glucose at 1 year [8]. The insulin response to a glucose drink fell on both Atkins and a conventional diet [9]. Insulin fell on all three diets in insulin-resistant women, and was the one marker that did not fall more on Atkins than on a high-carbohydrate diet [11].
Population
Adults with cardiac risk factors [8]; adults with obesity [9]; insulin-resistant women without diabetes [11].
Sources
[8], [9], [11]
Caveats
None of these trials studied people with diabetes.

How trials defined it

The trial abstracts describe Atkins as carbohydrate restriction and do not give gram limits [8]. In one trial, people got weekly instruction for 2 months, then 10 months of follow-up [7]. In another, they made a maximum effort for 2 months and then chose their own level of adherence [8]. One trial kept professional contact minimal to mirror how most people diet [9]. In insulin-resistant women, advice covered food choices without an energy target, over 8 weeks of weight loss, 8 weeks of maintenance and 8 weeks without contact [11]. In epilepsy, the modified Atkins diet was added to antiseizure drugs, with an average follow-up of 12 weeks [1] and up to 6 months [4].

Risks

Reported risks7

LimitedVery common

LDL cholesterol rise

Limited evidence: in one trial, 25% of women on Atkins had LDL cholesterol rise more than 10%, against 13% on a high-carbohydrate diet and 3% on Zone.

The numbers and sources
How common
Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
Effect
LDL fell on high-carbohydrate and Zone diets but fluctuated on Atkins, ending 0.28 mmol/L higher than on Zone (95% CI 0.04 to 0.52). LDL rose more than 10% in 25% on Atkins, 13% on the high-carbohydrate diet and 3% on Zone [11]. In adults with epilepsy, one trial reported raised cholesterol on the modified Atkins diet [3]. Another trial found no difference in total or LDL cholesterol after 3 months [9].
Population
96 insulin-resistant women [11]; adults with drug-resistant epilepsy [3]; 63 adults with obesity [9].
Sources
[3], [9], [11]
Caveats
Small trials that disagree. No trial measured heart attacks or strokes.
LimitedVery common

Digestive and other side effects (modified Atkins)

Limited evidence: in epilepsy trials, constipation was reported in about 17%, lethargy in 11% and loss of appetite in 12% on the modified Atkins diet.

The numbers and sources
How common
Very common: more than 1 in 10 people.
Effect
Across 5 RCTs reporting adverse events, constipation occurred in 17% (95% CI 5% to 44%), lethargy in 11% and anorexia in 12% [1]. In children, treatment-related adverse events occurred in 56.9% on the modified Atkins diet and 56.4% on the classic ketogenic diet [5]. Gastrointestinal and lipid side effects did not differ between the two diets in a 2026 meta-analysis [6].
Population
Children and adults with drug-resistant epilepsy [1][5][6].
Sources
[1], [5], [6]
Caveats
Pooled rates from the diet arms, not differences from control.
LimitedStudied in womenHow often is not known

Thiamine

One trial found more women on Atkins shifted to thiamine intakes linked to risk of inadequacy after 8 weeks.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
After 8 weeks, a significant share of women on Atkins moved to intakes associated with risk of inadequacy for thiamine, folic acid, vitamin C, iron and magnesium. On Zone, risk of inadequacy fell for vitamins A, E, K and C [12].
Population
73 women with overweight or obesity on Atkins, among 291 in four diet arms, assessed by 24-hour recalls [12].
Sources
[12]
Caveats
Intake, not blood levels. The abstract does not give the share of women affected [12].
LimitedStudied in womenHow often is not known

Folate

One trial found more women on Atkins shifted to folic acid intakes linked to risk of inadequacy after 8 weeks.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
After 8 weeks, a significant share of women on Atkins moved to folic acid intakes associated with risk of inadequacy [12].
Population
73 women with overweight or obesity on Atkins [12].
Sources
[12]
Caveats
Intake, not blood levels. The abstract does not give the share affected [12].
LimitedStudied in womenHow often is not known

Vitamin C

One trial found more women on Atkins shifted to vitamin C intakes linked to risk of inadequacy after 8 weeks.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
After 8 weeks, a significant share of women on Atkins moved to vitamin C intakes associated with risk of inadequacy [12].
Population
73 women with overweight or obesity on Atkins [12].
Sources
[12]
Caveats
Intake, not blood levels. The abstract does not give the share affected [12].
LimitedStudied in womenHow often is not known

Iron

One trial found more women on Atkins shifted to iron intakes linked to risk of inadequacy after 8 weeks.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
After 8 weeks, a significant share of women on Atkins moved to iron intakes associated with risk of inadequacy [12].
Population
73 women with overweight or obesity on Atkins [12].
Sources
[12]
Caveats
Intake, not iron stores. The abstract does not give the share affected [12].
LimitedStudied in womenHow often is not known

Magnesium

One trial found more women on Atkins shifted to magnesium intakes linked to risk of inadequacy after 8 weeks.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
After 8 weeks, a significant share of women on Atkins moved to magnesium intakes associated with risk of inadequacy [12].
Population
73 women with overweight or obesity on Atkins [12].
Sources
[12]
Caveats
Intake, not blood levels. The abstract does not give the share affected [12].

Mixed results1

LimitedHow often is not known

Dropout

Limited evidence: in a 1-year trial, 47% of people assigned to Atkins dropped out, against 35% on Zone or Weight Watchers and 50% on Ornish.

The numbers and sources
How common
How often is not known: the sources give no rate.
Effect
Of 40 people per diet, 21 completed Atkins, 26 Zone, 26 Weight Watchers and 20 Ornish [8]. In a 1-year trial against a conventional diet, adherence was poor and attrition high in both groups [9].
Population
160 adults with cardiac risk factors [8]; 63 adults with obesity [9].
Sources
[8], [9]
Caveats
Two small trials.

Supplements to consider

The nutrients research linked to this diet running short, each with its own page.

Thiamine

Limited One trial found more women on Atkins shifted to thiamine intakes linked to risk of inadequacy after 8 weeks.

Add both to Bio Hack

Folate

Limited One trial found more women on Atkins shifted to folic acid intakes linked to risk of inadequacy after 8 weeks.

Add both to Bio Hack

Vitamin C

Limited One trial found more women on Atkins shifted to vitamin C intakes linked to risk of inadequacy after 8 weeks.

Add both to Bio Hack

Iron

Limited One trial found more women on Atkins shifted to iron intakes linked to risk of inadequacy after 8 weeks.

Add both to Bio Hack

Magnesium

Limited One trial found more women on Atkins shifted to magnesium intakes linked to risk of inadequacy after 8 weeks.

Add both to Bio Hack

Claims tested and not found

  1. That Atkins produces more weight loss at 1 year than other popular diets. Mean 1-year loss was 2.1 kg on Atkins and 3.0 to 3.3 kg on Zone, Weight Watchers and Ornish [8], and the difference from a conventional diet was not significant at 12 months [9].
  2. That Atkins lowers blood sugar more than other diets. Glucose did not change significantly on any of four diets at 1 year [8].

Sources

  1. Mutarelli A, Nogueira A, Felix N, et al. Modified Atkins diet for drug-resistant epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Seizure. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2023.09.010
  2. Manral M, Tripathi S, Rawat D, et al. Modified Atkins Diet in Adolescents and Adults with Drug Resistant Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Epilepsy Research. 2024. https://doi.org/10.14581/jer.24001
  3. Martin-McGill KJ, Bresnahan R, Levy RG, et al. Ketogenic diets for drug-resistant epilepsy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd001903.pub5
  4. Manral M, Dwivedi R, Gulati S, et al. Safety, Efficacy, and Tolerability of Modified Atkins Diet in Persons With Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Neurology. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000206776
  5. Sondhi V, Agarwala A, Pandey RM, et al. Efficacy of Ketogenic Diet, Modified Atkins Diet, and Low Glycemic Index Therapy Diet Among Children With Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Pediatrics. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.2282
  6. Sharaf MA, Abdelhamed MH, Salah M, et al. Comparative efficacy of the classical ketogenic diet and modified Atkins diet in children with drug-resistant epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Seizure. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2026.01.014
  7. Gardner CD, Kiazand A, Alhassan S, et al. Comparison of the Atkins, Zone, Ornish, and LEARN diets for change in weight and related risk factors among overweight premenopausal women: the A TO Z Weight Loss Study: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.297.9.969
  8. Dansinger ML, Gleason JA, Griffith JL, et al. Comparison of the Atkins, Ornish, Weight Watchers, and Zone diets for weight loss and heart disease risk reduction: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.1.43
  9. Foster GD, Wyatt HR, Hill JO, et al. A randomized trial of a low-carbohydrate diet for obesity. New England Journal of Medicine. 2003. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa022207
  10. Johnston BC, Kanters S, Bandayrel K, et al. Comparison of weight loss among named diet programs in overweight and obese adults: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.10397
  11. McAuley KA, Hopkins CM, Smith KJ, et al. Comparison of high-fat and high-protein diets with a high-carbohydrate diet in insulin-resistant obese women. Diabetologia. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-004-1603-4
  12. Gardner CD, Kim S, Bersamin A, et al. Micronutrient quality of weight-loss diets that focus on macronutrients: results from the A TO Z study. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2010. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.2010.29468

Everything in the library